IPL is rare success story of games management in India. Because it is proving a top money spinner, it naturally attracts attention of powerful people, not necessarily for charity. One can always find faults with performers. Therefore, a fair play is expected from all quarters who matter in the Indian affairs. Let the truth prevail and justice be implemented.
Unless businessmen do disclose the murky and background brokerage acts of politicians and ministers, businessmen will become slaves of these politicians.
It is quite evident that minister has been paid 18% of equity to prove political brokerage. Modi, infact should try to get IPL separated from BCCI to teach the worthiness of political brokers without business.
Here is another example of Indian professionalism. If Lalit Modi has any say on any issues why not to discuss with BCCI first then make it public. With players even small negative public statement is big fuss for BCCI, then why so much liberty to Modi. Secondly is he college going youth who can impress girls and other kids on net by posting twits. At the end of day all these shabby behavior is poor show to the world, which full of Indian enemies.
I thought I would bring attention to the editorial's author on a portion of the text, which I feel could read better... 'BCCI President Shashank Manohar has only few days back written a strongly-worded letter to Modi, saying that his disclosure on Twitter was unbecoming of him as a chairman of the a sub-committee of the board.'
I would have written the paragraph as follows: 'BCCI President Shashank Manohar had recently written a strongly-worded letter to Modi, stating that his (Modi) disclosure on Twitter was unbecoming of him as a chairman of the a sub-committee of the board.'
Just felt this stood out from a well written article. Hope you aren't offended by this suggestion.
