why did gambhir give up running towards the crease when he was just 1 feet away.why did dravid slow up things and not take charge when needed 50 from 35 balls.why did it look dhoni was too casual in his approach coming down the track...why did bhajji give 70 odd runs in this match
Re: don't blame others Dhoni
by Arun on Sep 27, 2009 04:09 PM
We Are Thinking About India Can Achieve Their Best Potential And Results With Own Resources.Dont Think About Whatever Its Happen Pasts.Always Think We Can Steback With An Impressive Note With Winning And Grab With This Years 2009 ICC Champions Trophy. For Dr.Arun Achuthan. Consultant/Industrialist/US/UK. Best Of Luck For Indian Cricket Team **.
Re: Jai HO
by k krishnan on Sep 27, 2009 04:13 PM
even IPL is too much.best is advertisements .the way the hit sixers and takes wickets is seen to be beleived. we have virtually no competitors there. on a serious note if we stop buying products endorsed by these talented but non performing guys , it will be a lesson to them
bowler is not responsible for run but the batting problem if sachin made 40 to 50,dhoni makes 40-50,virat kohli and yusuf pathan made some run india definately won the match so don't blame the bowlers
Re: my team and batting order for CT
by nrmgrm on Sep 27, 2009 03:54 PM
What CT ? India will lose against Australia and catch the early flight back home dear. Sit relaxed like Sachin and Enjoy the cool drinks promoted by sachin and company.
wow dhoni is blaming bowlers for India's defeat . what about dhoni's batting if dhoni could have batted well india would have won the match bec they got such a good start . but dhoni is a kind of guy who will always blame others to cover his poor performance.why cant he perform in such tough situations and lead from the front and why he always depends on others to to go for big shots???????????
Re: dumb and idiot dhoni
by CHERUVU SRINIVAS on Sep 27, 2009 04:08 PM
Yes your observation need to be discussed. When Dhoni was batting its really funny. He was jumping like a jack (with due appologies to Jack)to connect the bat to the ball. His defence is not authentic. His attacking shot is backed with such power the ball even did not reach the close in fielders. when pak was down he should have brought in Harbajan; they would have played him tentetively and atleast we would have saved some runs.
Why do we need players like virat in team when we have talents like Manoj Pandey [remember his exploits with Bangalore in IPL-2] and Dinesh Karthik... two or three players from Maharashtra [salvi, kulkarni, niraj patel, ravindra jadeja, irfan, etc.] are also good prospects... whe are they not tested... R.Jadeja was unfortunately played in a couple of pressure matches recently and bumped off the radar... if dhoni's short of bowlers then he should have used irfan instead of tendulkar who is INJURED and cannot bowl some ueful overs, field sharply and bats very irresponsibly... actually its not only Dravid who is supposed to be a sheet anchor but it Tendulakr who has to play the role at the start of the innings and after his departure Dravid takes on while all others are stroke makers who can steal atleast one boundary in each over on an average... what say Dhoni???
Re: Why Virat???
by Sameer on Sep 27, 2009 03:50 PM
Ravidra Jadeja , I mean seriously . You took that Selfish Jokers name ? I don't care whose name you take but that ravindru jadeja's. He will be a curse on Indian team .
Re: Re: Why Virat???
by Yomesh Lodaya on Sep 27, 2009 03:53 PM
not particularly R.Jadeja... i meant that there are many others who could have been used rather than sticking around with those bunch of failures like virats and tendulkars... if you call Jadeja one of the selfish jokers... then you should readily find some more names from the current team to accompany Jadeja in the elite group of selfish jokers... what say?
Re: Re: Re: Why Virat???
by Sameer on Sep 27, 2009 03:57 PM
No, your logic is flawed because I actually can present proof. Ok picture that you are in crease while the opposition has ammased a score of 300 , the asking rate is 7 , and you score 60 something from 90 deliveries.
You are promoted up the order and you score 25 of 41 deliveries in a t20 ?
The 1st case was repeated later as well against other teams.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Virat???
by Yomesh Lodaya on Sep 27, 2009 04:07 PM
... i am hinting at the availabiSir... you are wronged in understanding my logic... i am not hell bent on a single persons called RJadejality of talent for Dhoni to pick instead of travelling all the way to SA with some injured deadwood in team like Tendulkar, Gautam, and dnt know who else will join the list going fwd... how many of other teams have these many injured players comparing the number of matches played off late... indian team has just come out of a good rest of almost 50 days and we already are bugged by injured ones in the team!!! Why is Dhoni feeling short of not one, not two but three bowlers... was the schedule of CT not announced well in advance... could he not figure out what can be his best bowling options for CT... if injury is the reason then Dhoni cannot complain of THREE bowlers short... this clearly lack of PLANING on part of INDIAN THINK TANK... u may not consider Jadeja but there are good options that have shown during the IPLs... why are they not using them and cribbing aloud about something that is a fault of there own... if he is THREE bowlers short today then he will be THREE Batsmen short tomo... seems Dhoni doesnt know that every team has a common factor of 11 players in the playing eleven... sorry sir, you are taking my analysis as an argument in support of Jadeja... this is not correct... You and Dhoni both need to open up your scope of view and capture / appreciate ideas on merit.. let me know if my idea is at fault...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Why Virat???
by Yomesh Lodaya on Sep 27, 2009 04:09 PM
Sir... you are wronged in understanding my logic... i am not hell bent on a single person called RJadeja ... i am hinting at the availability of talent for Dhoni to pick instead of travelling all the way to SA with some injured deadwood in team like Tendulkar, Gautam, and dnt know who else will join the list going fwd... how many of other teams have these many injured players comparing the number of matches played off late... indian team has just come out of a good rest of almost 50 days and we already are bugged by injured ones in the team!!! Why is Dhoni feeling short of not one, not two but three bowlers... was the schedule of CT not announced well in advance... could he not figure out what can be his best bowling options for CT... if injury is the reason then Dhoni cannot complain of THREE bowlers short... this clearly lack of PLANING on part of INDIAN THINK TANK... u may not consider Jadeja but there are good options that have shown during the IPLs... why are they not using them and cribbing aloud about something that is a fault of there own... if he is THREE bowlers short today then he will be THREE Batsmen short tomo... seems Dhoni doesnt know that every team has a common factor of 11 players in the playing eleven... sorry sir, you are taking my analysis as an argument in support of Jadeja... this is not correct... You and Dhoni both need to open up your scope of view and capture / appreciate ideas on merit.. let me know if my idea is at fault...
Re: Why Virat???
by roge on Sep 27, 2009 04:03 PM
well people forget that Irfan pathan was dropped by dhoni for another player ..not that virat is a bad player ..but a lill less experienced than irfan .U cannot expect tendulkar to fire everytime. dravid did his job ..but yusuf should be sent in a lill earlier ..ultimately .. you pay the price for rthe choices that you make.
Re: Re: Why Virat???
by Yomesh Lodaya on Sep 27, 2009 04:15 PM
let me know your definition of how often do you expect your most valuable player to fire... then lets evaluate whether Sachin fits int that even... i am not against Sachin... but i am calling for some responsibility and character from the most senior and revered player in the team... expecially in a crunch and a pressure match lime yesterday... what more you need to call for a quality show from a quality player like Sachin... India Pak Match... 300 plus score to chase... difficult conditions... limited batting options... how many more reasons does he need to understand the value for his wicket... i am not calling for sachin's head but i am calling for some sense and some value that he needs to put in for his wicket... Had he even scored 40 runs off 60 balls yesterday the result could have been definitely different...
i think irfan pathan is a much better option than yusuf. He bats well than yusuf. His technique is more sound than his brother. And in bowling dept. he will be more consistent than his elder brother. Yusuf should play only 20-20. One day and test are not his cup of tea.
Re: Why Virat Kohli was bowling?
by roge on Sep 27, 2009 03:48 PM
Dhoni is getting big for his boots .. ignoring important players and sending using them according to politics .. yuvraj singh is looking down the barrel for the captancy .. dats worrying dhoni ...the leadership battel has begun.
