Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: deshpremi
by Against Pseudos on Sep 10, 2009 12:29 PM
you seem like like the Hutch d 0g_no_matter_wat_keep_wagging_the)tail_and_coming_back...is this your whole idea of Publicity
england could never b a good ODI team n in the absence of KP n flintoff they r not looking like winning team. they need to improve their batting. even aussis r not looking like good ODI side as they r also struggling. they r winning only bcoz eng playing poor than them.
Re: england team
by Against Pseudos on Sep 10, 2009 12:14 PM
DP:
Agreed.... But still, to their credit, Aussies are posting some good finishes.. which England is clearly lacking.....
Johnson gave them one in the second ODI....
Yesterday it wasn't even required after England's "batting display"..... ;-)
I think Champions Trophy is going to be where we'll clearly see these differences coming out, with India, Sri Lanka and South Africa in the picture, if the Aussies don't pick up their game from here on.... ;-)
Re: Re: england team
by Deewaker pandey on Sep 10, 2009 12:20 PM
AP: yup in CT Aussis might played well in the presence of ponting but they will have to improve the game.
r could never b a good ODI team n in the absence of KP n flintoff they r not looking like winning team. they need to improve their batting. even r not looking like good ODI side as they r also struggling. they r winning only bcoz eng playing poor than them.
