Good job..seriously.. but then dude i see VIRAT as a OK costumer in ur rating. thats really surprisin.. Yusuf atles wins us the match once a while.. virat sucks.. he never did dat @ the Int Level. n moreover virat is not 100 % fit. If @ all u had followed the news.i feel irfan can be given a chance..after all he s a better allrounder than virat.
Re: Politics in Modern India :P
by rambo only on Oct 08, 2009 07:28 PM
I said OK - because - He was tried as last minute replacement, got only few chances and did OK. However, he and Amit Mishra can be commented upon after some more chances are gives.Thats why I did resrted to OK, you can take it as 'no comments' also.
Re: Re: Politics in Modern India :P
by srikanth rapaka on Oct 08, 2009 07:37 PM
dude.. the need of the hour is not a batsman.. we have PLENTY of them.. if de guys top the order don perform we can put the whole burden on the tail enders.. loser aussie coach spoilt him.. literally.. he was one the few bowlers in de world who could reverse swing n bring the ball in.. he is gifted.. garry can get the talent bac.. he wil b a gud customer.. it need not b only irfan.. can b nyone who is talented :)
Re: BC
by Virtual Insider on Oct 08, 2009 09:27 PM
Team India always has chinks in the armours and links itself to other teams (dependent on other teams to see it through the qualifiers)....
INDIA THE NO.2 TEAM, WAS NO.1 TEAM JUST FEW WEEKS BACK.
Sachin – Afflicted with Tennis Elbow and Groin. Sehwag – Out with injury. Went to tour of England hiding Injury Gambhir- Just recovered from Injury – Remember he had to return from SL.-Though in good form. Dravid – trying a comeback in ODIs after a gap of 2 years, even at the cost of team’s interest. Yuvraj- Still nursing injury Yusuf Pathan – Fit to play at Baroda level, not at International Level Raina – Some time In , Some time out (When Rohit Sharma is in)- Trying to cement his place. Dinesh Kartik – Trying to establish himself for last 3 years Virat Kohli - OK Zaheer – Already out due to Injury for a long time Ishant – Lot of promise , but appears to have fizzled out R P Singh – Trying to hold his line , length and his place Harbhajan- Main bowler now, was erratic in CT Amit Mishra – Performed OK.
NICE STATE OF AFFAIRS FOR INDIA - THE NO.2 TEAM, WAS NO.1 TEAM JUST FEW WEEKS BACK.
Re: INDIA - THE NO.2 TEAM
by srikanth rapaka on Oct 08, 2009 07:18 PM
Mr Rambo.. u must be seriously blind to call Virat Kohli OK. Yusuf Pathan atles wins us the match once a while.. Virat dusnt even do dat. n most important technically virat too is 40 % fit. Thanks to the wonderful internal politics.
Re: Re: INDIA - THE NO.2 TEAM
by rambo only on Oct 08, 2009 07:24 PM
I said OK - because - He was tries as last minute replacement, got few chances and did OK. However he and Amit Mishra can be commented upon after some more consistent performance.
Re: Re: Re: INDIA - THE NO.2 TEAM
by srikanth rapaka on Oct 08, 2009 07:30 PM
ur survey actually is 99% correct..we still have lots of allrounders who can fill in the spot. Virat is suffering with a shoulder injury. Doc advised him a 2 week off.. but stil he manages to SA..how ? we mite be losing many sachins if this continues. courtesy : leading news channels
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: INDIA - THE NO.2 TEAM
by srikanth rapaka on Oct 08, 2009 07:40 PM
thats true.. other than sachin , dravid, ganguly, laxman.. sehwag , gambhir, yuvraj we never had a world class batsman who cud fac guys like mcgrah n lee.. i feel dhoni is seriously a unfit battie.. n guess wat ders lot of talent.. its jus wasted.. one of ma relatives s a ranji player.. he tells me everythin works only wit money.. nothin else.. der r players who can match sachin's calibre
Re: Re: Re: INDIA - THE NO.2 TEAM
by rambo only on Oct 08, 2009 07:22 PM
I simply forget Ashsih Nehra- Admirable work , but remember coming after 2-3 years of injury . Can be relied upon only if performs for 1 year with breaking down again
Coaching Staff :
Venkatesh Prasad – He should be held responsible for poor Pace Bowling Performance Robin Singh – Same as Prasad, our fielding was of very low standard.
So Why these two are being persisted with ? Permanency creates complacency.
