Live updates: India vs SL

Message deleted by moderator
Re: Guys.... by Legend Dhoni on Nov 20, 2009 06:38 PM Ponting and Dravid are both better than Tendulkar on bowling friendly conditions and can survive better.On the other hand Tendulkar only fires on dead n batting wickets.In Australia or SA he only scores runs if he gets a relatively easy wicket like SCG    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Guys.... by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:44 PM Legend Dhoni: Thanks for the information. :) Sachin's runs speak for him, thank you very much. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Guys.... by deewaker pandey on Nov 20, 2009 06:42 PM did u forgot his century in 1992 in perth.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Guys.... by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:42 PM Sachin avg in AUstralia in 1999 facing Mcgrath and Lee = 46.xx Dravid avg in same series = less than 10.xx Case closed.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Guys.... by vijeth m on Nov 20, 2009 06:52 PM Yeah true...u r the only TRUE cricket expert in the world and the whole world is bluffing.So its only because of flat wickets sachin scores. Wah! great ! First try to aprreciate a person rather than criticizing without knowing anything.Sachin has the world record for scoring most no of tons as well as runs overseas.Now u say that all the wickets in the world are dead wickets..huh????    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Guys.... by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:44 PM perth in 1992 = fastest wicket. Sachin scores 114. perth in 2008 = reasonably fast. Sachin scores 71. Wanderers in 1993 = bouncy. Sachin scores 111 Centurion in 1996 = fast. Sachin scores 169 Birmingham in 1996 = Bouncy Sachin scores 118. I can keep going on.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Guys.... by Legend Dhoni on Nov 20, 2009 06:47 PM n plz could anybody tell me the result of the series. Sachin played well so it must be on the winning side.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:32 PM Leo Here and There: A test century in a drawn test is withdrawn? :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:35 PM yes...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:36 PM Leo Here and There: Good. That quite explains your faulty mathematics display on the forum. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:42 PM come on.....4 matchs 8 innings.. one cnetury... big deal???    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:47 PM leo..u f00l he scored 2 centuries in that series..one in sydney and one in adelaide. get your numbers right. Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Subramani on Nov 20, 2009 06:43 PM there are two centuriesyoufool. and 3 halfcenturies Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:45 PM Leo Here and There: Back to your ONE century? :) 154* and 153 are ONE century? :) Good counting. :) Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:46 PM he has scored a century at least in all his tours to Australia..how many batsman boast that? Sachin avg in Aus = 56.xx Lara avg = 41.xx Case closed. Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Subramani u f00l by Subramani on Nov 20, 2009 06:33 PM oh you fool, saching scored 154 not out in sydney test go to mirror and watch, whether you are fool and confirm it. 2008 sydney test match, which this aussie won with the help of umpires    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:37 PM u said he scored centuries...joker....he only scored one test century...uf00l    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:39 PM what about 71 in the perth test? or because it is 29 runs short, u don't count it.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:38 PM Leo Here and There: ;-). 154 not out is obviously NOT a century.. eh? :) I knew there was some trouble in your counting capability. Now you confirmed it. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:43 PM u said centuries...centuries means plural..means mroe dan one....wich was incorrect..u idiot..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:48 PM make it 1 plus 1 = 2 Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Maihoon Don on Nov 20, 2009 06:47 PM f00l...one in sydney and one in adelaide...1 1 = 2 kiddo. Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:46 PM Leo Here and There: 154* in Sydney. AND 153 in Adelaide. Makes ONE century? :) Great. We must join your mathematics coaching classes. :) Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Subramani u f00l by kiran sharma on Nov 20, 2009 06:32 PM have u forget sydney test which was won by BUCKNOR    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:33 PM Leo Here You will make a chart of pontings performance when Bucknor was umpire & also make a chart of performancd when bucknor was not umpiring in match    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:37 PM silly excuse...rules/umpiresr same 4 all players...sachin koi exception nai hai..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:39 PM But Ponting is a Exaption So Please Make this chart too AftarAll You are having Expert Facts    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:34 PM KS: Leave her. :) She is suffering from amnesia and selective retention. :) Afer all she is just learning to count, so it takes time to reach 3 figures, and mistakes can happen at her age. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:34 PM Ap she ..... ?    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:37 PM You didn't know? :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:38 PM nooooo Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:41 PM Leo Here and There: Oh. Good for you. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Subramani u f00l by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:42 PM Ap is he 6 ? Forward   |   Report abuse

Message deleted by moderator
Re: leo and PNB by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:30 PM ohhhhhhh :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator

Re: agsint seudo by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:28 PM Leo Here and There: That you are still learning to count. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: agsint seudo by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:32 PM as usuall u don hve any facts....get lost..    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: agsint seudo by Against Pseudos on Nov 20, 2009 06:35 PM Leo Here and There: Thanks for the compliments. :)    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: agsint seudo by drunken monk on Nov 20, 2009 06:28 PM wasim akram is a good bowler.    Forward   |   Report abuse

Re: time by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:29 PM bye sir :)    Forward   |   Report abuse