why the hell dc selecting gibbs?only bcoz he is a local?or he is a big player?dc should consider who is playing,when smith is in good form and he played some good innings for dc why dc dropping him,is it fare?ok if u can't drop gibbs then drop harris he is not a bowler like brat lee or some other he also giving runs like other part timer bowler and dc has lot of bowler they can manage 4 overs insted of him u can play with smith and gibbs both and then dc can chase 2oo also,and whats a meaning of selecting harmeet or shoib and jassy when they cant bowl and cant make 1 run for the team,some thing is going worng in dc.
Its clear that a few matched in IPL were fixed. Teams losing from winning positions, teams winning from losing positions, good bowlers bowling badly, non-regular bowlers taking hatricks repeatedly, teams losing by one run, two runs etc etc. In cricket such things happen but not as frequently as they have happened in this IPL. Match after match you cannot have a close contest. Something is definitely fishy. So guys watch d IPL for fun but dont get sentimental like many people from mumbai got during mumbai-rajasthan match which I suspect was fixed.
GILCRIST SHOULD BE BLAMED FOR DECCAN'S LOSS.AS A CAPTAIN YOU HAVE TO BELIEVE IN YOURSELVES AND MOTIVATE YOUR TEAM.SHOULD READ THE SITUATIONS WELL.GILCHRIST LACKS THESE ABILITIES.HE IS ONE OF THE BEST BATSMEN,BUT NOT CAPTAINCY MATERIAL.I STILL DID NOT UNDERSTAND THE LOGIC OF WINNING TOSSES AND BOWLING FIRST.HE DID NOT INDUCES BELIEF IN HIS BOWLERS,AND MADE WRONG DECISION OF BOWLING FIRST.
I dont know If you guys know it, If you understand it right. Match fixing is not usually done by teams, team owner, team captain. Let me explain how it works. BUT I DONT KNOW, IF MATHES ARE FIXED, JUST EXPLAIN
There are team of bidders who bid that one team will win surely. This bid continue until Match ends. So when every one bet on Decan to win, the person who bet on Kings 11 to win(very few match fixers) will(or would already) picked a last over bower/fielder/batsman to turn the match their way. so that player(who drop catch/bowl easy ball, dont take easy run/ get his share addition to all other money).
Re: Re: What is match fixing!
by naveen dhanerwal on May 18, 2009 03:10 PM
Hammm..how the hell they can/could know who will play/bowl the last over? How can when all players seat in dugouts? But, whatever, I haven't seen many matches I watched on Saturday and Sunday. Rohit was amaging, but got out when they were wining!
Re: did anyone see pict of yesterday's priety's hug to yuvi ..?
by deewaker pandey on May 18, 2009 11:06 AM
do u think dis is the only point to be notice during match?? where is the bat and ball here??
Symonds out is crucial but the way he was given out gives an idea of match fixing, if one bail is out of the stumps before, then entire stumps had to be removed, if this is correct then when ball hits the stumps if one bail is removed then it has to be given not out
Re: seems its fixed
by G k on May 18, 2009 11:10 AM
no.if one bail is disturbed and other bail is intact it is enough to disturb that,what ur saying is if both bails r not there.
Re: Re: seems its fixed
by naveen dhanerwal on May 18, 2009 03:14 PM
Yeah, GK is right. If only one bail is disturbed then one has to remove the second but if both are disturbed then you have to uproot the stumps.
