"It will be the first bilateral series between the two countries since the Sri Lankan team was attacked by militants in Lahore [Images] on March 3 and returned home with six wounded players."
Wake up Rediff!!!!!! Before u write such non-sence article u need to check it before it's publish. You have written the Lankan team was attacked by "Militants" whereas all the world seen that, the attack was done by the "Terrorists". How you can write such kind of non-sence article?????
Re: Who attacked on team? Militants or Terrorists ???
by Saket Kumar on May 12, 2009 03:47 PM
wotz the diff between "militants" and "terrorists"???????????????.......
Re: Re: Who attacked on team? Militants or Terrorists ???
by pradeep kothari on May 12, 2009 03:52 PM
The mass media often uses the term "militant" in the context of terrorism. Journalists often apply the term militant to movements using terrorism as a tactic. The mass media also has repeatedly called terrorist organizations militant groups or radical militants. The terms often serve to avoid usage of the term terrorists.
Newspapers, magazines, and other information sources may deem militant a neutral term, whereas terrorist conventionally indicates disapproval of the behavior of the individual or organization so labeled, regardless of the motivations for such behavior. Militant, other times, can refer to any individual engaged in warfare, a fight, combat, or generally serving as a soldier.
Re: Re: Re: Who attacked on team? Militants or Terrorists ???
by Hemendra Bhatia on May 12, 2009 05:44 PM
Indian "SECULARIST" (and Pro- Muslim) Media always use the word Militant when Describing TERORROIST Activities in Kashmir but when they talk about People Attacking US -they are Terrorist and of Course a Hindu - even if he or she is allegedly Remotely Linked to a Minor Incident where Some Fakirs were Injured would be Labelled as not only "TERRORIST" but "HINDU TERRORIST" world over of course the ISLAMIC TERRORISTS of the Kind operting in Kashmir and under the "SIMI" and "IM" are known as "ISLAMISTS". So it was an Attack by Islamist - because no Matter Srilankan Cricket Team were a bunch of Sportsmen - No Matter they had come to show support for Pakistan and as a mesure of Goodwill they were "Infidel" and for "ISLAMISTs" - they are worth Killing - and that is not new one of the Early "Islamists" of 20th Century Maulna Mohmmad Ali and his Brother Shaukat Ali (unfortunately in Mumbai we have Roads named after both of them) had mentioned that a Muslim who may be Sharabi ,Gunda , Murder and Rapist is better than "Infidel" Mahatma Gandhi. All the Secularists in India seem to be Relatives of CHUnilal TIkamdas YAdav.
