He shld send symbolic message in the middle of IPL by dumping Buchanan as coach...his not doing it smacks of ignorance of KKR affairs and not courageous enough to take strong actions.
Re: Why SRK is not dumping Buchanan
by Amey Joshi on May 11, 2009 02:52 PM
BCOZ of SRK is BIG ZERO in Cricket. this moron is not courageous. Kaise doom dabake bahaga.
Re: Re: Why SRK is not dumping Buchanan
by Maihoon Don on May 12, 2009 12:20 AM
he is more courageous than your pop who produced an inferior and malnutiotioned alien like u
Re: Re: Re: Why SRK is not dumping Buchanan
by Amey Joshi on May 12, 2009 09:52 AM
and bcoz ofovercourageous ofur nazayazfatherwhofuckedroadsidepros (sellsherbodyfor30Rs)produced nazyazhypocritemoronrottenalienlike u.
Re: Ajit Agarkar
by naveen dhanerwal on May 11, 2009 03:06 PM
lol..you know what I'm also a big fan of him, but he is just good for nothing. I watch matches of KKR just because of him. Although, I think he's not utilised in proper manner. They could use him as a pinch hitter but they didn't. Even he's not used good in bowling. He's a wicket taker bowler and must have bowled opening overs. But Buchanan has other ideas! I want to ventilate by saying something real about him but I know rediff will makr it abuse..so understand what I want to say about Buchanan! ;) He could be a useful allrounder for India but I personaly think Ganguly spoiled him and because of Zaheer Khan. Everybody know how many chances he had given Khan despite of his poor form!
Re: Ajit Agarkar
by naveen dhanerwal on May 11, 2009 03:06 PM
lol..you know what I'm also a big fan of him, but he is just good for nothing. I watch matches of KKR just because of him. Although, I think he's not utilised in proper manner. They could use him as a pinch hitter but they didn't. Even he's not used good in bowling. He's a wicket taker bowler and must have bowled opening overs. But Buchanan has other ideas! I want to ventilate by saying something real about him but I know rediff will makr it abuse..so understand what I want to say about Buchanan! ;) He could be a useful allrounder for India but I personaly think Ganguly spoiled him and because of Zaheer Khan. Everybody know how many chances he had given Khan despite of his poor form!
Re: Re: Re: Re: SRK no more owner
by Amey Joshi on May 12, 2009 09:54 AM
Hahahaah I am leader and u eat my s h i t for bcoz of Malnutrition Hahahahahahaah
Re: Title is most definitely an SRK PR Plant
by Guest on May 11, 2009 02:37 PM
SRK is not a coward or loser. Take aminute look nto the bigger picture .Its Buchanan who is doing the damage to KKR
Re: Re: Title is most definitely an SRK PR Plant
by Maihoon Don on May 11, 2009 02:41 PM
agreed....buchanan seems to think KKR is made of only 4 foreign players...pathetic coaching and BM is just following him like a slave....but the bong chamchas are no good either...they are purposely playing badly....all in all a very disunited and pathetic team KKR.
Re: Title is most definitely an SRK PR Plant
by Maihoon Don on May 11, 2009 02:28 PM
so if someone does good or not u will always label him as u see it eh? stupid dumbo...
Re: Re: Title is most definitely an SRK PR Plant
by naveen dhanerwal on May 11, 2009 03:09 PM
SRK dosen't screwd dada but dada screwd him! I haven't seen a politician like him. He should try his luck in poiltics. I 'm sure he'll succeed there!
Srk forgot to pay mr joshis surgical money for AZZZ treatment after using it....why dont u ctc karan directly for ur payment...sick people always ill mouth
Re: Mr Amey joshi money is still pending
by Amey Joshi on May 11, 2009 02:40 PM
Hahahhahahaha Chakde y r u getting jealous. I know u r biggest asslickerof HijadaSRK. You and ur familys daily morning job is to do the same. I don't require anyones money u moron Chakde. I always give tips to person like SRK. U seems to be his munshijjii
