Re: ' The Chaddi ' erected to honour Saurav Ganguly
by Amitav Sen on Mar 26, 2009 10:19 AM
next time you go out with a bike, do not wear a helmet, you should not wash vegetables and fruits before eating it, right...remember an Indian cricketer named Raman Lamba he would have lived had he worn a helmet. Idiots like you, keep this discussion alive. thanx and regards
Re: Re: Re: ' The Chaddi ' erected to honour Saurav Ganguly
by Amitav Sen on Mar 26, 2009 10:58 AM
At least Bengali's are behind their cricketer's not like people in Karnataka who dont even bother for the Great Rahul Dravid.
Re: Re: ' The Chaddi ' erected to honour Saurav Ganguly
by raza on Mar 26, 2009 04:55 PM
Yeah which means you acknowledge that u have got a fat ass :-)
Re: Re: Re: ' The Chaddi ' erected to honour Saurav Ganguly
by Sanjay Aurora on Mar 26, 2009 10:33 AM
Hey Mr.Raza, U better eat cows at park circus and worship Taliban.... Varun Gandhi is comin behind u!!!!!!
Re: Re: Re: ' The Chaddi ' erected to honour Saurav Ganguly
by raza on Mar 26, 2009 04:53 PM
In a nutshell u r a loser. That's why you are acting like a cry baby. Never mind dada won't be affected by such cry babies. He has seen and handled enough like you. Got that Paki.
Re: ' The Chaddi ' erected to honour Saurav Ganguly
by mainak sengupta on Mar 26, 2009 10:29 AM
could u atleast did make a big hype?? or even 0.0001% of wht ganguly did??? do let all know what sort of chaddi tribute fits for you.....I think tht will make more sense than wht u have written here
I think the so-called Aussie Strategy is back and that too the team has suffered in the last outing. It is a typical 'Greg Chappell' thing. I would assume that the loser would be SRK in this outing too. The composure and composition is critical before getting into the tournament. The sole strategy is about adding the leadership fun to an already struggling team. Also to be noted that IPL is about money making and Ganguly is a crowd puller than anyone in the team. The team should be built around him and probably create a hype about his 'after-math' retirement to attract more than bringing 'negative' strategy, which could potentially fire-back....
Its shame that Indain Govt could not able to provide security to IPL matches, because security reasons torney is moving out of India, UPA govt indirectly agreed that we could not provide security, Chiddu agreed that we are imptent, no security...
Buchanan's theory is cockeyed and smacks of a clever trick to get rid of Dada who in any case should have quit cricket as he is not fit enough to play even ODIs leave alone T20. Buchanan, like Greg Chappell, is playing politics and it's a shame on KKR that they allow such things to happen. If they dont want Dada, then they should tell him and close the chapter. Buchanan thinks he is some kind of professor of cricket, but he is just playing politics and causing confusion. It is just a 20-over game damnit. What kind of "tactics" are you talking about? Heights of stupidity.
KKR is a privately owned team and the owners can hire and fire, modify the job roles of any of their employees (in this case cricket players) in their quest for improving the fortunes of the team and increasing the revenue.
Thus unlike in the case of selection of official Team India, one has got nothing to say about the treatment meted out to Ganguly.
However, if anyone cares to analyse KKR's poor show last year, the following cannot be missed:
1. McCullum had not much to show after his blitzkrieg knock in the opening match against Bangalore.
2. Gayle and Ponting were not available for the full tournament and in the matches that they did play, contributed no match winning performances.
3. Shoaib Akthar was a disaster, helping to win one match with a good haul of wickets but subdued by drug controversy later.
4. Players like Agarkar and Umar Gul did well in patches.
5. Ponting's mental condition might not have been at its best coming from a controversial tour to Australia by India and smarting under humiliation of a low pay (USD 400,000) compared to the pay got by the likes of Gilly, Lee and Symonds.
In spite of these, if KKR did whatever they actually did, Ganguly did make a contribution with his bat and ball to such performance.
If SRK and JB ignore these hard facts and want to make Sourav a scapegoat, it is plain bad.
Why is Sourav hanging on? Buchanan did give a clue when he said he would have been hurt if he were in Ganguly's position!
