Discussion Board

Chawla hits unbeaten 102 for Sussex


Total 13 messages Pages | 1
star
match over
by star on Jun 15, 2009 03:02 PM

this 2 day back article from cricinfo

match is over yesterday ..... sussex win by 10 wickets
Piyush taken t0tal of 8 wickets in match (2-1st innings,6-2nd inning)

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Somu Rajappa
its simple
by Somu Rajappa on Jun 15, 2009 01:42 PM  | Hide replies

worcestershire after conceeding a lead of 332 are 120 for 3 .....why such a hell lot of confusion

    Forward  |  Report abuse
star
Re: its simple
by star on Jun 15, 2009 03:01 PM
match is over yesterday ..... sussex win by 10 wickets
Piyush taken t0tal of 8 wickets in match (2-1st innings,6-2nd inning)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
icc
stupid mistake from stupid website
by icc on Jun 14, 2009 07:28 PM  | Hide replies

worcestershire need 212 more to avoid follow on, and not 212 more to win as stated in the article.

another pathetic editing from a pathetic website. hope the people who are responsible for this article read this and feel ashamed to be in their professions.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Narendra Shaha
Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by Narendra Shaha on Jun 15, 2009 07:46 AM
you stupid they need to avoid an innings defeat

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
sanil shah
Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by sanil shah on Jun 15, 2009 01:46 PM
Kindly go throught the article ...you would know who is stupid ...u or the website..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
mukesh sharma
Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by mukesh sharma on Jun 15, 2009 12:36 PM
You are an idiot, in Ist inning Worcester scored 288 & now in II inning they need to score additional 212 to avoid inning defeat. you are a pathetic reader just like to conclude things without understanding.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
G k
Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by G k on Jun 14, 2009 07:39 PM
mate,212 to make sussex bat again/avoid innings defeat,not follow on...even u were wrong like rediff...lol

   Forward   |   Report abuse
icc
Re: Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by icc on Jun 14, 2009 07:43 PM
ooops yes!!
thanks for the correction, mate.
And to think I criticized Rediff when I was wrong myself. I must cut down on the beer!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Raman Judge
Re: Re: Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by Raman Judge on Jun 14, 2009 08:58 PM
I like ur attitude

   Forward   |   'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Raman Judge
Re: Re: Re: stupid mistake from stupid website
by Raman Judge on Jun 14, 2009 08:59 PM
Moderator whats wrong with my message!!!!!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 13 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message