Re: all the frogs supporting oz
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 11:21 AM
KS:
England definitely deserve to win.... but nonetheless, Australia has given some good fightback... This is purely from a cricketing perspective.... dunno about the frogs angle you've brought in....
Re: Re: Re: all the frogs supporting oz
by Pavas Agarwal on Jul 20, 2009 12:04 PM
Kalpesh u missed him bcoz it was holiday and against pseudo was not in office to enjoy free internet.Against pseudo BTW is the most productive guy in office.
I think England may win, because after Clarke and Haddin their is hardly any batting coming up. Australians have a very good tail-enders. So it will be a tough time for English bowlers to bowl out Australia. While Australia may go for a win, in that scenario there is a probability of errors on their part. England on the other hand dont have formidable bowlers. So its even steven, but on the look of it, you feel England will gonna win this.
Re: England may win
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 10:10 AM
SM:
A fine and succinct analysis of the situation. It will really be tough for the Aussies to win, given they have lost too many wickets and 185 is already about 50-100 runs too high for the sixth.... they might lose the seventh any time now, and then it might start becoming a battle for survival for them right from the first session tomorrow... What will be interesting to see will be what kind of time wasting strategies Ponting's tail enders will deploy given their own stance against the English tactics carried over from the first test...
But all in all, your analysis is perfect.... England deserve to win this one.... especially after coming close to a whisker of losing the first....
Re: Re: hate them or love them u can tignore them the great aussi
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 09:18 AM
Varun:
;-).... considering that great pussies are aiming for 522 to win after an almost won first test, I take it that your personal milestones are never short of 12,011 for a win in a Test match... .anything below is treated by you with the contempt its due.... right?.... :)
Re: Re: Re: hate them or love them u can tignore them the great a
by nibin on Jul 20, 2009 09:42 AM
Aussie players are better than the selfish sachin marathi
Re: Re: Re: Re: hate them or love them u can tignore them the gre
by kalpesh shah on Jul 20, 2009 11:16 AM
lolare manush, how dare u to compare ausie with sachin., dont u know even today indian team bank on sachin at the time of need .
All depends on you Clarky. Lets see if you make a double century and save the test for Aussies or even win it. We know the power behind you is Lara Bingle.
The report says "Ponting was given a torrid time by Flintoff in the big England all-rounder's final Test at Lord's. He clipped six fours to reach 38 when he was bowled trying to cut a full delivery from Stuart Broad [ Images ] shortly after lunch."
Re: error?
by icc on Jul 20, 2009 07:47 AM
Full delivery means its not short enough for cutting. It does not mean its a full toss or over pitched delivery! There is no error here. Your understanding of cricketing parlance is not upto the mark.
Re: error?
by Vivek Chandra on Jul 20, 2009 06:06 AM
Cutting a full delivery is not that common, but some players do it frequently. Remember Vengsarkar? In his early days he'd come to the forward stroke and try make a full length deliver a half volley or even cut it through the 3rd slip and gully.
It is possible but may not be a good defense strategy.
all the bad decisions that went against the Aussies are well deserved, what goes around comes around, remember when the ball hit Tendulkar on the body he was given LBW and many more decisions were biased when Indian went down under.
Re: Australians deserve it
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 04:54 AM
JC:
That just goes in to show that contrary to your erroneous beliefs till date, all teams in the world "cheat".... :) So don't worry the next time you bother to write about Australians' cheating.... :)
Re: Australians deserve it
by msgblogger on Jul 20, 2009 10:44 AM
Jenifer, a batsmen can be given out LBW for any part of the body if its pitched in line to hit the stumps...
Why was Ricky Bhai angry?? He just got a dose of his medicine na......... "To Australian captain Ricky Ponting's [ Images ] anger, the on-field official Rudi Koertzen [ Images ] did not refer the decision to the third umpire but gave Hughes out"
Re: Ricky bhai ANGRY???? WHY???
by Guest on Jul 20, 2009 05:41 AM
At least Pointin accepted the decision and the OZ's didn't threaten to walk of the field or the series like the Indians did in Australia. Bloody shameful ..
Re: Re: Ricky bhai ANGRY???? WHY???
by Varun on Jul 20, 2009 09:15 AM
since it was an error. Unlike blatant cheating from aussies and their friend the WI man.
Re: Re: Re: Ricky bhai ANGRY???? WHY???
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 09:20 AM
VaRun:
;-)..... "blatant" cheating.... versus an "error".... wow...
Lets see us play the English at Lord's next.... everything will return to its due "cheating" position, I'm sure --... (provided we lose of course)... :)
Re: Ricky bhai ANGRY???? WHY???
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 04:53 AM
CG:
That just goes in to show that contrary to your erroneous beliefs till date, all teams in the world "cheat".... :) So don't worry the next time you bother to write about Australians' cheating.... :)
Why was Ricky Ponting angry? He just got a dose of his own medicine....."To Australian captain Ricky Ponting's [ Images ] anger, the on-field official Rudi Koertzen [ Images ] did not refer the decision to the third umpire but gave Hughes out." Serves him right
Re: Ricky Angry???
by Against Pseudos on Jul 20, 2009 04:54 AM
Guest:
That just goes in to show that contrary to your erroneous beliefs till date, all teams in the world "cheat".... :) So don't worry the next time you bother to write about Australians' cheating.... :)
