Discussion Board

I didn''t quite play like Yuvraj: Panesar


Total 42 messages Pages | 1
Indian man
Singh and Singh but still Singh is a King
by Indian man on Jul 14, 2009 09:20 AM

Singh and Singh but still Singh is a King

When Singh is a King - King should be a Singh

So the difference between the Singh and a King is Monty

    Forward  |  Report abuse
rajiv k
english sense of humour
by rajiv k on Jul 13, 2009 09:12 PM  | Hide replies

looks like it is gonna take sometime for indians to understand an english sense of humour

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ashish
Re: english sense of humour
by ashish on Jul 14, 2009 05:21 AM
WOW.. rajiv you understood Engish sense of Humor...WOW.. the way you write in English doesn't make anyone feel comfortable with your hold on english language

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashish
Re: english sense of humour
by ashish on Jul 14, 2009 05:27 AM
By the way Rajiv K, have you just gone overseas and learnt english that Indian looks foolish to you all of a sudden??

Idiot, Swan was complimenting Panesar by comparing him to Yuvraj..

I think Rakesh Chitalay has better IQ then you..


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Re: english sense of humour
by Against Pseudos on Jul 14, 2009 06:01 AM
Ashish:

Rakesh Chitalay said Swann had complimented Panesar?.... :)

I think you are today's winner of the IQ talent search.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Spitting Cobra
Re: Re: Re: english sense of humour
by Spitting Cobra on Jul 14, 2009 08:22 AM
dude,
your comments are so difficult to understand....:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashish
Re: Re: Re: english sense of humour
by ashish on Jul 14, 2009 06:36 AM
Did Rakesh Chitalay said that? sorry I didn't read that, but Chitalay gets my vote over rajiv k for sure?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
karthik
Re: english sense of humour
by karthik on Jul 13, 2009 09:23 PM
yeah rajiv. what a pity. people can't understand a bit of humour. Yuvi would have enjoyed it. wastrels it was actually a compliment you fools.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
karthik
Re: Re: english sense of humour
by karthik on Jul 13, 2009 09:27 PM
The english,if they read some of our comments(who? rakesh chit?? what) would be rolling on the floor laughing

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Rakesh Chitalay
Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by Rakesh Chitalay on Jul 13, 2009 08:01 PM  | Hide replies

What did Panesar mean when he said that he did not bat like Yuvraj??? Was it a left handed compliment?? Whatever, but it was in bad taste.Monty and even his forefathers can not think of playing like Yuvraj in their wildest dreams forget emitating him in real. But one wonders English players are in awe of Yuvraj`s batting.May be it started with India chasing epic 316 in final and of course his T20 innigs in last world cup.Monty must understand that Yuvraj is superior to him even as a left arm spin bowler.Pieterson can vouch for that I am sure.Monty must concentrate on his own game and stop commenting on others, else next time when he comes against Yuvraj he will get the same treatment as stuart Broad.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nisha thoas
Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by nisha thoas on Jul 13, 2009 09:21 PM
hahahaha..With the likes of chitalay in our country, it gives a lot of low IQ guys a lot of hope in life. India is home to millions of chitalays!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Ashok Trivedi
Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by Ashok Trivedi on Jul 13, 2009 08:15 PM
Moron. Monty said in a humble way that he didn't quite bat like Yuvi, doesn't mean that he is saying he is better batsman than Yuvi. He was reacting to what Swann said, in a humorous way. Read between the lines.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Supriya Korrapati
Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by Supriya Korrapati on Jul 13, 2009 10:13 PM
what is 'EMITATING' ? Kindly explain ??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Guru Dandamis
Re: Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by Guru Dandamis on Jul 14, 2009 09:03 AM
Emitting..ive heard. Imitating...ive heard...but what is Emitating????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
KIRON P
Re: Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by KIRON P on Jul 13, 2009 11:41 PM
Comeon Supriya, its obvious and there is no need for any further explanation.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
sidddharth
Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by sidddharth on Jul 13, 2009 10:32 PM
the global search for a 'benchmark for stupidity' comes to an end finally.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ashish
Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by ashish on Jul 14, 2009 05:23 AM
YOU'RE AN IDIOT..as simple as that

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ankyr
Re: Yuvraj is better bowler than Monty Panesar
by ankyr on Jul 13, 2009 10:12 PM
u start watching some senseless but comedy movies like scary movies series etc ....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
anupam sharma
this indeed was a great escape
by anupam sharma on Jul 13, 2009 07:23 PM  | Hide replies

Really enjoyed the match last night, hope we have another thrilling game in lords

    Forward  |  Report abuse
vicky ash
Re: this indeed was a great escape
by vicky ash on Jul 13, 2009 07:29 PM
the match was fixed if ud notice not even one ball wasyorked all were full deliveries & way otside the off stumps which the batsmen dint have to bother playing last 10 overs proove the point mitchel johnson wasent given a ball y ????
it was all fixed

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
bob mathews
Re: Re: this indeed was a great escape
by bob mathews on Jul 13, 2009 07:53 PM
Ignorance is indeed bliss!!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
justin
Lesson for Indian tailenders
by justin on Jul 13, 2009 07:04 PM  | Hide replies

The dedication by the last wicket batsmen is a lesson which the Indian tailenders should learn..put them in this situation and they would have lost the game in 10 out of 10 situations..because they feel they are only responsible for bowling..batting is not what they are supposed to do..useless

    Forward  |  Report abuse
kannan venugopal
Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by kannan venugopal on Jul 13, 2009 07:19 PM
as sunny said munaf is useless as a fielder and hopeless has a batsman.then why u pcik him in side... slectors and dhoni plz answer..... i would never ve him in my team. others include nehra rp singh prasad, srinath, ishant gret INDIAN tail.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Story editor
Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by Story editor on Jul 13, 2009 07:06 PM
I don't think it is the case now...Harbhajan, Zaheer, Murali Karthik have done such things in recent past.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
I am
Re: Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by I am on Jul 13, 2009 07:14 PM
SE, Harbajan and Zaheer aren't 10 and 11 they are 8 and 9, and they are far better batsman from past 4 to 5 years

   Forward   |   Report abuse
justin
Re: Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by justin on Jul 13, 2009 07:09 PM
I agree till the extent of Harbhajan but the rest are all just their to wag their tails before the overseas pace bowlers..it like putting a chicken in front hungry tigers..

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Tushar Sakhalkar
Re: Re: Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by Tushar Sakhalkar on Jul 13, 2009 07:13 PM
Problem with Indians is that they have short memory wen it comes to they fellow beings...Zaheer and Bhajji recently had 100 partnership with Zaheer playing a BIG role....

   Forward   |   Report abuse
justin
Re: Re: Re: Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by justin on Jul 13, 2009 07:22 PM
Zaheer and Bhajji had a 100 partnership!!!! against whom Russia????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Sameer
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Lesson for Indian tailenders
by Sameer on Jul 13, 2009 07:49 PM
That was 80 not 100 dude
and this was recentely in 2008-09 when Australia was in India

Forward   |   Report abuse
Ram
Good for him
by Ram on Jul 13, 2009 06:58 PM  | Hide replies

It was good for him not to have played like Yuvraj. Else he'd have thrown away his wicket...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Shilpa Lagali
Re: Good for him
by Shilpa Lagali on Jul 13, 2009 07:06 PM
Yuvraj dont throw his wicket, instead he likes to play with the pace of the ball, if not him then we would have not won last Twenty20-2008 World cup

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Shakir Ansari
Re: Re: Good for him
by Shakir Ansari on Jul 13, 2009 08:19 PM
pakistan has won..

these indiand canot paly like pakistan

   Forward   |   Report abuse
manoj
Re: Re: Good for him
by manoj on Jul 13, 2009 08:20 PM
sharukh khan se poocho

   Forward   |   Report abuse
srinivas satyanarayan
Start learning doing variations in bowling, u r a bowler
by srinivas satyanarayan on Jul 13, 2009 06:56 PM  | Hide replies

Good job done monty i recon u better learn useful skills in bowling, u r a bowler

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Against Pseudos
Re: Start learning doing variations in bowling, u r a bowler
by Against Pseudos on Jul 14, 2009 06:00 AM
SS:

Yeah... he is a bowler, and should have thrown his wicket like another bowler Kevin Pietersen..... right?.... :)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Spitting Cobra
Re: Re: Start learning doing variations in bowling, u r a bowler
by Spitting Cobra on Jul 14, 2009 08:21 AM
dude,
your comments are so difficult to understand....:)

   Forward   |   Report abuse
justin
Re: Re: Start learning doing variations in bowling, u r a bowler
by justin on Jul 14, 2009 08:41 AM
No, He should'nt have allowed the opposition to score 600 odd runs.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 42 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message