pakistan playing a test after so long a time, they prepared a such a flat wicket even 12th man can score a hundred.... in fact those who did not score a 100 shud be dropped from the team ....
Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Zalim Sahib on Feb 25, 2009 10:09 PM
How come Tendulkar doesnt score a tripple century as India always make a flat track
Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by BRUNO MONTEIRO on Feb 25, 2009 05:54 PM
How does anyone explain why Sri Lanka is now 124/5 in 2nd innings... ??? it is a flat track right.. then what happend... Anyhow it also proves that Shewag's triple centry in pakistan was a fluke due to flat track.. any comments..
Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by varun luthra on Feb 25, 2009 06:03 PM
Bruno Monteiro :
U said Sehwags Triple century was a fluke, but if u refresh ur memory a bit, India Won that match by an innings, which means India Bowled out Pakistan twice and batted once, so if wicket was Flat, thn y did not Pak managed to score like they did in this game, and more over, SL in this Game lost 5 wicket on 5th day, which is understandable after 5 days of wear and tear, and othr factor ws that thy knew that the game is dead nw so they were not bothered about that.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Eagle K on Feb 25, 2009 11:42 PM
Sewhag's triple (also in Pak) was excellent because it won the match for India and Younus's achievement was fantastic because it saved the match for Pakistan especially in light of the problems through which Pakistani Cricket (and cricket in general) has been going. Lets give credit where it is deserved. Well done Younus Khan.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Eagle K on Feb 25, 2009 11:48 PM
U say the SriLanks werenot "bothered" (ya & be "ok" with a last minute battnig collapse?!Laughable!) & the pitch deteriorated after "wear & tear",well,did it SUDDENLY turn in2a deteriorated pitch as soon as Sri Lanka came2bat a second time?!Where Pak batmens add misery 4SL bowlers moments earlier?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Eagle K on Feb 25, 2009 11:43 PM
Yarun.. triple centuries deserve credit (Younus or Sewhag) regardless of the track. Yes it was a flat track however Sub continent tracks are usually flat anyway and how often are triple centuries scored? Lets not forget that most of the triples scored have been on batting friendly pitches anyway.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Eagle K on Feb 25, 2009 11:45 PM
14months after his/their last test, in his first match as Captain, Younus batted out 836minutes, under pressure in the second innigs, chasing a huge first innigs total of 644 against one of the best teams in world (with Murali (highest wicket take) & Co.).
Re: Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Eagle K on Feb 25, 2009 11:40 PM
moderator deleted my response due to no apparent reason. Biased as ever. India site afterall.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Purposefully made flat !!
by Eagle K on Feb 25, 2009 11:44 PM
Somehow people are ignoring the fact that 14months after his/their last test, in his first match as Captain, Younus batted out 836minutes, under pressure in the second innigs, chasing a huge first innigs total of 644 against one of the best teams in world (with Murali (highest wicket take) & Co.).
Re: all these triples are personal records
by rajesh ghadge on Feb 25, 2009 04:23 PM
Why there is no name of Sehwag because he has also scored triple century.Can anybody explain
Re: Re: all these triples are personal records
by rony com on Feb 25, 2009 04:29 PM
arrey gh aa ti,
theek se padh. sehwag was not a captain. so not named in the top table. His 310 against pakistan was not highest against pakistan. so he is not in bottom table. tum log sirf uchal padte ho... puri cheez nahi dekhte.. isliye raj thakrey jaisa aadmi tum logo ko use karta hai.. puri report padh aur samajh aur phir uchal..
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: all these triples are personal records
by Ramesh Vadivelu on Feb 25, 2009 05:25 PM
He he Well said. Though I am poor in hindi I started loughing after reeding his coment
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: all these triples are personal records
by Ramesh Vadivelu on Feb 25, 2009 05:25 PM
He he Well said. Though I am poor in hindi I started loughing after reeding his coment
