Re: @ Ritwik Bhuyan
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Feb 17, 2009 09:16 AM
I am happy with my narrow vision, and I take positives out of it and not sorrow bogged with iffies and butties....
Re: @ Ritwik Bhuyan
by Against Pseudos on Feb 17, 2009 11:23 AM
Rathore:
Reading your message, it appears that you only see what you want to see.... ;-)
On one side you say Aussies would have won the match if they played well (suggesting that they didn't play well), and then you say that NZ were on top....
But the result (which is the fact and not your surmises at work) says something completely different.... :-)
Pathan brothers continued their devastating form in the domestic circuit too as they steered Baroda to a four-wicket win over fancied Mumbai in the West Zone Ranji one-dayer at the Madhavrao Scindia cricket ground in Rajkot on Sunday.
Yusuf Pathan slammed a quickfire unbeaten 72-ball 101 and stitched a 103-run partnership with his brother Irfan. The junior Pathan remained unbeaten on 51.
"We should've won the game easily, it's as simple as that. It was one of the poorer run chases I've seen. I'm devastated with that loss ... [and] the recognition of the situation, only chasing 150 on a pretty good deck.
Re: Vettori after match.....
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Feb 16, 2009 12:47 PM
Mr.WETtori, you must have come in on an opening stand and have faced Bracken or Siddle.
Its easy for you to exhibit that everything were on the Cards and you missed the lunch.
Accept that Aussies were a better team in the end, and proved it by some best fielding, bowling...to prevent you taking the victory that you ought not to have.
Re: Re: Vettori after match.....
by Anurag Rathore on Feb 16, 2009 02:17 PM
Now you are criticizing Vettori. But it's the fact that NZ lost it. Not even Vettori any cricket expert can say after seeing the match that NZ was on top when they needed only 25 off 18 balls with 7 wickets in hand.
Re: Re: Vettori after match.....
by Anurag Rathore on Feb 16, 2009 12:57 PM
BB McCullum - 61 off 47 balls NT Broom - 36 off 26 balls NL McCullum - 10 off 4 balls GD Elliott - 23 off 30 balls
You can see only Elliot was unable to score quickly. It shows NZ lost because of Elliot bad batting rather than Aussies good bowling. Why Aussies bowled badly against other NZ batsman?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Vettori after match.....
by Anurag Rathore on Feb 16, 2009 02:21 PM
Forget about Elliot. I have discovered the real Aus when they faced India last month. Anything else you want to say!
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Vettori after match.....
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Feb 16, 2009 06:38 PM
Don't mingle tests with T20, Mrs.Anurag.
Talk from one point, otherwise, I will speak something about the Newly discovered Indian Team that LOST the last ODI against a weak(est) Srilankan Team.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Vettori after match.....
by Anurag Rathore on Feb 16, 2009 02:08 PM
You have typical Indian metality, because for you Aus is still champ. Thats why you are not accepting the fact that Aus didn't win it, NZ lost it. Any expert can say that NZ was on top when they needed 25 off 18 balls with 7 wickets in hand.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Vettori after match.....
by Anurag Rathore on Feb 16, 2009 02:05 PM
NZ was required 25 off 18 balls with 7 wickets in hand. Still you are not accepting Aus didn't win it, NZ lost it.
