Yes but all this are after 80 for old days and 100-300 matches career not just 17-18 matches or 30-50 matches. So no one can plan like every 17-18 match to play exactly and sleep. It would be just an exception, which everyone can see clearly.
Re: @TruthBitter
by TruthisBitter on Dec 28, 2009 07:22 PM
thats not the criterion to judge thats y we use either averages or SR to judge the performance
Re: @ulta pulta
by ulta pulta on Dec 28, 2009 07:21 PM
Yes but where is our strike bowler they are all even inferior to Gillespie. So i said this criteria for india not others. I just quoted other to prove what a genuine bowler means.
Re: Re: hahahah
by ulta pulta on Dec 28, 2009 07:12 PM
i thought average and centuries are always controvertial so why not MoM because it means 99% times he has won us the match. Just less than 1% MoM from losing side
Re: Re: Re: Re: See what
by ulta pulta on Dec 28, 2009 07:06 PM
compare this with our genuine bowlers ridiculous compare this with our all rounders comparable on par.
Re: I would say our batting all rounders perform much better than
by kiran sharma on Dec 28, 2009 07:03 PM
yes like Yuvraj and Sehwag and sometimes Sachin also
have good all rounders .Pakistan has Abul Razzaq and Afridi,Srilanka has Mathews,Jayasuriya,Even Bangladesh has a genuine all rounder Shakib ul Hasan.Why India is not able to produce a genuine all rounder
Re: Every team except India
by The King on Dec 28, 2009 07:04 PM
Even if we get, he will be able to perform only in one or two series...after that he will have to use his skill in adevrtising.....
Re: Re: Every team except India
by kiran sharma on Dec 28, 2009 07:05 PM
that's the main reason why India is not consistent in performance despite of having star players
I did not mean to say drop Zaheer or say Sreesanth who cant bat but i mean to say we should also care for batting till no.9 and just 2 slots for genuine.
