maximum score is 150 by pointing in the first match no 200 or 300 that means english bowlers managed to limit the kangaroos with accurate bowling on the contrary austarlian bowlers did excellent job only once by reducing england 102 all out but not again. australia bowlers failed to all out england in first test which is due to last wicket partnership by england so also not declaring in another drawn test. in all ricky pointing wasted 2 tests as captain to capatalise and hence 1-2 loss insted of 3-2 win so pointing must take his team mates on toes like boss of private firm & get the work done which is it self very tough
Can you analys, who should be the winner? Bowler Matches wkts BW Hilfenhaus (Aus) 5 22 PM Siddle (Aus) 5 20 MG Johnson (Aus) 5 20 SCJ Broad (Eng) 5 18 GP Swann (Eng) 5 14 JM Anderson (Eng) 5 12
Re: Whether Ashes'09 a fix?
by aman sydneysider on Aug 25, 2009 10:45 AM
had it not rained and had the umpiring been good, aussies wud have won 5-0 they r such true world champs they make all genuine fans emotional go oz i dont read posts i dont reply to
Re: Re: Whether Ashes'09 a fix?
by Senthilkumar on Aug 25, 2009 11:21 AM
hai r u mad. Oz where played the circket as a gentleman game. They abused all players when they were top and now it is time for pay back.
Re: Whether Ashes'09 a fix?
by ashish khare on Aug 25, 2009 10:39 AM
GP Swann is winner, as he frustated top order every time he comes to bowl & take there early wickets.
Re: Re: Whether Ashes'09 a fix?
by pravin sarode on Aug 25, 2009 11:07 AM
if this type of statistics would have worked then india has sachin rahul most run getters in test but still we are at number3 all round performance like board, swan also impulsive performance like run out by flintoff dominate test match also
