laxman is only a good test match player nothing more than that he does not have leadership qwality he was borin in odis
but still laxman. just bcoz of few 100s vs AUS is overhyped like anything he does not have 100s in SA,ENG,NZ but people overhype him as if he greater than don bradman people forget that there r other teams alos against which u need to make runs avg vs SA 37 AVG VS ENG: A POOR 33 AVG VS NZ: 40 AVG VS PAK:38 with 0 100s in ENG,SA,NZ LAXMAN is just an average player no need to hype him
Re: laxman
by Sourav Das on Aug 20, 2009 09:37 AM
u can't measure Laxaman just from average.The pressure & situation he tackle is unbelivle.every good player score run when team perform well.But Great player can give their identity when team struggling.& he done many of most....Every run from his bat, Match Saving or Match Winning.That 's Wy he is called Galactico of Cricket..
Re: We know your very very special talent
by thirdumpire on Aug 15, 2009 06:50 AM
YES a match winner when he plays for money and ONLY for other teams....... lol
Re: victim of trimurhy
by sushil verma on Aug 15, 2009 06:42 AM
yes, i still remember the australia tour of india one day series which india lost. laxman was on 99,on strike and 46th over was running in progress.he just leaved one of the out going full toss and later after 4 balls he made his single for century.that match india lost in last over with only one ball spare.
Re: Re: victim of trimurhy
by explorer on Aug 15, 2009 12:20 PM
You dont remember how many times Ganguly stayed for long to complete century? How many he sent others ahead when scared to face fast bowlers?
Re: Re: Re: victim of trimurhy
by Abhi s on Aug 15, 2009 04:41 PM
an idiot ganguly hater he always opened in odis at least u know that an opener has to face fast bowler not spinners
Re: victim of trimurhy
by Abhi s on Aug 15, 2009 04:42 PM
blame me,urself,our family also that BECHARA LAXMAN did not make 10000 runs hahahahhahahahahha....... idiot
Re: class is class
by Indian on Aug 14, 2009 08:41 PM
he doesn't market himself properly thts why he is playing county instead being a regular player for India....Laxman is too good for modern cricket, he is modest and soft guy who only let his bat say.
Where as cricketers other trio did fairly well in PR and Marketing dept. When I say marketing its not endorsements....its showing the world time and again that you are capable to play intl cricket...specially showing it to BCCI.....PR with BCCI
Re: Re: class is class
by Andy Louis on Aug 14, 2009 08:55 PM
please think before you write any crap. Sachin and Dravid are anyday better than Laxman. The stats say for themselves. Laxman is very good but his voerall record is not that good. couple of miraculous innings don't make you a champion,
Re: Re: Re: class is class
by halwa singh on Aug 14, 2009 09:06 PM
While your note about Dravid can be agreed, you need to remember that Laxman has saved or won more test matches for India than Sachin. Shows you don't watch cricket.
Re: Re: Re: Re: class is class
by YoBro on Aug 14, 2009 09:35 PM
and countless times Sachin has set us up for victory...its not just about who "saves us from defeat", but about "who sets us up for victory".
Re: Re: Re: Re: class is class
by Varun on Aug 14, 2009 10:03 PM
True. Was about to say that. Sachin is a great player but not a champion. Hasn't crossed that line consistently enough to be called a champion. Laxman has but he is not as spectacular as sachin. BTW it is just my opinion. No offenses to Sachin fans.
Re: Re: class is class
by explorer on Aug 15, 2009 12:22 PM
Laxman, like Kumble is a great player and received less than the respect he deserved. But Sachin and Dravid are definitely ahead.
