Discussion Board

Accept WADA clause, says OCA chief


Total 3 messages Pages | 1
Atul Thakur
lol!! who told you o give suggestions Mr. Randhir
by Atul Thakur on Aug 05, 2009 03:55 AM  | Hide replies

I hope you are aware that its cricket and its not there in Olympics. Its ridiculous to say that when everybody has signed it then Indian cricketers should also sign. Who knows where is he going to be next week?? when you can simply tell sports persons to give a mobile number and tell them to appear in 24 hrs or 2-3 days then it can be done. If somebody doesn't appear after 3 calls, ban him/her. Don't except any excuses and it should be player's responsibility that they are definitely available in 3 calls. now what is problem in that nobody can get rid of drugs from their body in 2-3 days. Forget about security concerns but it is just absurd to inform about whereabouts in advance. Nadal, Federer, FICA (Int cricks) and nobody likes this clause but they don't have any option, if they don't sign it then they are out of game. they are just telling Indian cricketers to sign just because they had to sign. BCCI is big and it can force the issue so its doing it. If ICC doesn't agree and bans BCCI then internatinal cricket can be over. BCCI will just have to remove this budget cap from the IPL team expenditure and players will be earning 10-30 million dollars/year, then all the loyal International cricketers (like ricky and others who boast of putting country before IPL) will also come to IPL. I will hate that because I want to see India become number 1 test side in the world and win the world cup. Still I just don't understand this whereabouts clause.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Atul Thakur
Re: lol!! who told you o give suggestions Mr. Randhir
by Atul Thakur on Aug 05, 2009 03:59 AM
Its just that once ICC has done the mistake of signing contract with WADA now every person involved with any sports has started telling that crciketers should also sign. come on they don't need to and yes at least BCCI rules world cricket for the moment. I am quite sure one day WADA is going to change that clause because everybody has signed it but nobody likes it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Atul Thakur
Ok Mr. Randhir, we listened, now shut up
by Atul Thakur on Aug 05, 2009 03:52 AM

Mr. Randhir, who are you to suggest that?? ICC signed contract with WADA then evrerybody has statted considering them in olympics. Come on, this is cricket and it is not there in olympic and I am quite sure one day WADA will have to change this rule because various sports bodies have signed it but nobody likes it. Its ridiculous to say that when everybody has signed it then Indian cricketers should also sign. Who knows where is he going to be next week?? when you can simply tell sports persons to give a mobile number and tell them to appear in 24 hrs or 2-3 days then it can be done. If somebody doesn't appear after 3 calls, ban him/her. Don't except any excuses and it should be player's responsibility that they are definitely available in 3 calls. now what is problem in that nobody can get rid of drugs from their body in 2-3 days. Forget about security concerns but it is just absurd to inform about whereabouts in advance. Nadal, Federer, FICA (Int cricks) and nobody likes this clause but they don't have any option, if they don't sign it then they are out of game. they are just telling Indian cricketers to sign just because they had to sign. BCCI is big and it can force the issue so its doing it. If ICC doesn't agree and bans BCCI then internatinal cricket can be over. BCCI will just have to remove this budget cap from the IPL team expenditure and players will be earning 10-30 million dollars/year, then all the loyal International cricketers (like ricky and others who boast of

    Forward  |  'Report abuse' disabled by moderator
Total 3 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message