Ross Taylor has been the victim of bad decision once again. In the last test also , he was wrongly given out. Why does bad umpiring only favour Ausies? That is the real strength of Australia.
Re: Bad Umpiring
by All Right on Nov 29, 2008 01:04 PM
I think your dumb head forgot the bad decisions (at least 4) Hayden got in India. that doesn't mean taylor wasn't a victim of bad delivery. Understand what you are talking about before fuming out your agony against a quality team, which is still World No.1 in terms of Cricket.
Re: Re: Bad Umpiring
by hari ray on Nov 29, 2008 01:56 PM
bad decisions have become so common (thanks to the harem called "elite umpires") that people have started defending them. In football, tennis etc., referees have been suspended or dropped if given rank bad decisions. that helps to develop accountability. in cricket, the elite umpires have no accountability. that is why blinds like bucknor could continue for so long and now he is back
Re: Bad Umpiring
by Mojo Jojo on Nov 29, 2008 11:17 AM
One bad decision does not affect the game much and Ross taylor is not a player who will take on the aussies single handed and score 400!!!. These are part and parcel of the game. Try to accept these facts and lets not crib over these.
Re: New Zealand
by All Right on Nov 29, 2008 01:09 PM
Aiye...
New Zealand can beat Aussies if they have an early chance of Indian Pitches, where ball doesnt beam to the waist of a 6 year boy. But, trouble starts up. Aussie fields are sprinted with good pitches, greeny and fast outfields...unlike here.
If NZ prevent an Innings Loss, its a miracle, however, don't worry, they will manage to get defeated by a heavy margin in a couple of day... Aussies have reclaimed their strength here, and still No.1 in terms of their Average & Winning Peaks.
