When a batsman is running to make a run, he has to run like a bull. If anyone comes in his way may get injured. Simple... Watson has no reason to stand in gambhir's way unless he was intentionally standing there either to injure him or to injure Gambhir.
Re: Kumble what a jerk?
by Play World on Nov 02, 2008 10:08 AM
u idiot.Who included amit mishra in team india?was it kris srik or stupid vengs..Vengs and chappel made a lion look like rat.Vengs nd chappel known for their attitude problems.Both like to dictate to others.
What is role of Rajeev Shukla in Indian cricket. Does he not pick any wrong doing of Aussies? Is he not our media manager? This guy is just enjoying buffet dinners and that is his contributation.
Re: Media Manager
by True Blue on Nov 02, 2008 07:21 PM
Shukla is a chamcha of Sonia Gandhi in the congress party. He must be doing his chamchagiri instead of media management during his stint with the Indian team.
my think is any player make mistake you have to punishment you see why is make like that mistake you have to justice and give punishment. that right decision to give to gambir this this first mistake you have to give light punishment next time you do like this give heavily this is to mach
so the holier than thou australians, when u r on the winning side everything is fair, is part of the game & are spontaneous reactions. but when meted out the same treatment u cry foul. bloody racist whites. learn to accept defeat gracefully. true mr. gilchrist the difference of culture does show in ur behaviour.
Gambhir was provoked during his runs and that was as if he was going to be punched on his face. It could be very dangerious when a good cricketer is taking runs for his country India. It was equal human reaction that prompted gambhir to act in that manner as he used his elbow a bit to show his reactions. Both must have been equally punished if the Wrong is really Wrong ! But in these evil times it seems wrong is becoming right and right is becoming wrong.
This punishment is grossly unfair and bad for international cricket. Clearly, Gambhir was provoked and delibertely so, with the malicious intent of upsetting him. For one, this is cowardly cricket by Australia, which has had a lousy history of playing unsportsmanly cricket. Second, the rule seems to mean that culpability of the provoker can be ignored or that he gets away with a much light punishment, no matter what the provocation is or the motivation behind it. The motivation was certainly mean, nasty and needs as deterrent a punishment as Gambhir has been given. Ravi Shastri, Saba Karim and others seem to have turned a blind eye to the fact of provocation. Stich needs to be taught a lesson. He should not be allowed to get away.
