The indians put themselves under pressure by withdrawing case against Hogg. They should have continued with that. aussies played the game brilliabtly to made Kumble agree on get back for Hogg and now they will make all effort to penalise Bhajji. Its Kumble fault and should not have pulled back on Hogg issue..
RE:Kumble shouldnot have withdrawn case against Hogg..
by premraja on Jan 29, 2008 09:38 AM
very true. it was wrong on the partof Kumble to have doen so.
Attributed to UK convicts as they left the shores of the UK for Australia. I think breeding will always show up...why blame the Australians..they were bred from the dregs of society..they can never improve..it will always show up..sledging, cheating...etc its part of their blood
1. How can ICC appoint a Newzealand Judge for this case ?...Why not to appoint anyone from SA ?
2. Why in such cases always ICC appoints white people only ?
3. Why the hearing is underway in real court ?
4. How can a Newzealand judge can occupy a judge seat in Australia ?... Is it ever possible that an Indian judge occupies a judge seat for a hearig in Pakistan?
5. Is ICC rented a court in Australia for this hearing ?
It's a foregone conclusion that Bhajji will be found guilty with some sop thrown, in say a 2-match ban instead of 3. Unless proven by normally accepted rules of evidence, we should not accept such a verdict.
LIKE BEST BAKRY CASE THIS CASE SHOULD BE TRANSFER TO INDIA, IN AUSTRALIA THERE IS NO CHANCE FOR INDIA AS WHITE PEOPLE ALWAYS SPEAK AND STAND BY WHITE PEOPLE. pROCTOR IS A PERSON FRON RECIAL COUNTRY AND HE PLAYED CRICKET WHEN THERE IS RECISM IN CRICKET, THERFORE HE WILL ALWAYS STAND BY WHITE PEOPLE.
The Non-invitation of Mr. Sunil Manohar Gavaskar, whose name was 50% on the Test Series just shows how Narrow,Convoluted and bigoted the Australians are, in their pathetic way of playing a Gentleman game.
For the award of the Gavaskar-Border trophy, it was atrocious manners on the part of the Australians not to have invited Gavaskar who was very much in the commentators's box to the presentation ceremony y/day, just because of his outspoken comments against Proctor. Is the entire country so bereft of maturity and social manners. BCCI should protest against this dis- honour to the whole country. Australians have again proved that they are a colony of descend- ants of ex-convicts by this unsavoury move.
RE:Australians have no social etiquette
by chris on Jan 29, 2008 09:28 AM
I believe the song goes.
"Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee are the champions, my friends. And we'llllllllllllllllllllllllll keep on fighting, till the end. We are the champions, we are the champions, NO TIME FOR LOSERS, Cos we are the champions... of the woooooorrrrrlllldddd."
So you see quite clearly, we have no time for losers (Indians).
RE:Australians have no social etiquette
by Sheery Joshua on Jan 29, 2008 09:44 AM
Let another mouth praise you, yu fool. (only if its genuine). Yes, champions....self-made champions by cheating. Cheaters of the world. Man, enough, you are fighting a losing battle. Very much typical on and off the playground.
RE:Australians have no social etiquette
by on Jan 29, 2008 09:48 AM
Sunil, you are a dog. Your narrow minded and cruel post lends weight to the stereotype of Indian cricketers and supporters as vulgar, uncouth, vain poor sports who can't handle losing. You come from a country that burns effigies of their own players if they don't perform to a set of unwritten rules and performance standards. To mock a man's wife for getting cancer is one of the lowest cowardly acts I could imagine. I pity your children if you are allowed to breed.
RE:Australians have no social etiquette
by Bodhisatwa Shome on Jan 29, 2008 09:32 AM
typical aussie mentality...arrogant, ignorant obnoxious (only with respect to cricket though)....they are Tur*s in evrything else
RE:Australians have no social etiquette
by vik sam on Jan 29, 2008 09:38 AM
Zip your lip, you bloody galah!!! Don't try to baffle us with ur bullsh*t! Aussies would be going "A over T" next time they visit India!!
