ok bye guys.... i had lot of fun arousing your ire... fake patriotism...instead of arguing ..all u idiots know is to abuse a girl....u r even more pathetic than this indian team here in aus... shame on u
RE:RE:match fixing
by sudhanshu abrol on Jan 16, 2008 12:35 AM
If INDIA has ppl lik u, INDIA doesn't need enemies.. Its nt bout winning o loosing, its bout playing ur heart out, ok.. arggg, who m i arguing wid anywyz.. Decimate, MY FOOT..
RE:hadnsome aussies
by Davinder Duggal on Jan 16, 2008 12:38 AM
Send your daughter or sister in their locker room to vent out their stuff-- and later on you can join in the fun too, Nisha Singh
The Indian team lacked in strategy to face Australia in the current series. In 2005 Ashes series, Vaughan didn't accept the cathing agreement proposed by Ponting. The other thing was, Vaughan had best fielders in the field. He had too many good fielders when the actual 11 players took a break when they fielded. Many commentators, ex-players raised concern over those but Vaughan triumphed. England managed to win the series 2-1.
RE:Take a leaf out of Michael Vaughan's Ashes heroics 2005
by . on Jan 16, 2008 12:47 AM
is the agreement between captains more binding than the icc rules which clearly stipulates that the main ump in case of doubt, will take advise from the sq leg ump n can refer to the third ump.
RE:RE:Take a leaf out of Michael Vaughan's Ashes heroics 2005
by Indian on Jan 16, 2008 02:23 AM
Hi .
You have a good point. But you forget that the agreement was proposed by Mr. Integrity, for the benefit of Mr. Integrity, and resulting in a contentious catch favouring Mr. Integrity.
It is probably because of that ICC has no problem. What they wouldn't have tolerated is such an agreement favouring the worst "Racist" team in this world. Yesss.
As you know, the ICC also has funny ways of terming as "unofficial" those matches which they feel this "Racist" team has not played in the true spirit of the game, the spirit which Mr. Integrity has defined in his latest episode unveiled at Sydney.
