Yuvraj Singh definitely deserves to be dropped for the third Test. When a player represents the country, it has to considered a honour and the player needs to show focus and determination in each of the matches. Yuvraj's mind is now on wooing Deepika Padukone and he lacks in focus. There is no need to rely on the past glory of a player. He should be replaced with either Dinesh Karthick or Virender Sehwag.
I have seen that your postings are decent. But can you ask the other aussie - Chris to shut his gob and go out of this board.he is the one who started the venemous message and rightly spitting cobra gave back.Nothing wrong in that. I am still not sure if you and chris are the same under psuedo names.However your postings make good reading.
We indians are truly hurt by the behaviour of the aussie player. I have my sister and brother who are in SYD and MEL and beleive it or not, their neighbours and friends have been apologising to them for the behaviour of the aussie cricket team.How come we never hear arrogant behaviour from your famous swimming team, your rugby team, your famous tennis players.I have tremendous respect for people like Pat cash, hewitt. These are decent blokes.After Ponting took over, aussies have become arrogant.Even the famous legends in the hall of Fame have written to Cricket Australia that they are very worried about the image of australia your cricket team is building up.
Dravid , the only player to have helped India on right track but was not recognised by Indians. Only outside cricketers showed respect for Dravid. In this way we should be ashamed calling Aussies Racist. We are ourselves racist. Dravid was given a wet pitch and India lost the match at Eden where the crowd was supporting SA's. Dravid was also shown Chappel and Tendulkar commented after reaching Bombay that we have returned from an alien land.
RE:Always on Track
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 11, 2008 10:26 AM
vsgiri, dont bring regionalistic thoughts to this forum.. dravid, tendulkar, ganguly, laxman, kumble all are greats,, and will fk all ausiis in rest of the matches.. ausiis are sore looser..monkey race.
RE:Always on Track
by chris on Jan 11, 2008 10:21 AM
Dravid is an exception to the rule, an Indian with spine, guts and determination. He was however not big enough to bring such qualities to his captaincy.
There's a billion of you little monkeys playing the game, your BCII or whatever it's called is cash strapped up while the people starve so you can't blame lack of funds, yet your side scoring 300 runs against a make shift uni Australian team is some achievement and rallying cry. So I ask, what is the reason? Why are Indians so utterly terrible at cricket? What do you think?
RE:Repost because I want some answers
by Preeti Vikram on Jan 11, 2008 01:03 PM
Chris,
You have a wrong name. You are insulting your own god by having his name.The whole world knows the ancestory of the aussies. You guys were sent by the brits as indentured and bondedlabourers for the crimes commited by your ancestors and forefathers.
So dont give us Indians a lecture. We are one of the oldest civilization and still thriving despite being occuiped for several centuries by outsiders.
It is not that I hate all aussies. I have some very wonderful aussies but dirty scums and monkeys like you spoil the names of all aussies.I have been chatting with many of my aussie friends for the last one week on this sydney test issue and all of them, I repeat, ALL of them are very very upset with your cricket teams behaviour.
So just shupt and leave this board.This board is only for decent aussies of which there are many in this world.
RE:Rediff---u suck all time
by aditya kochhar on Jan 11, 2008 04:00 PM
yes u are right rediff sucks after all dravid is the wall of india he is the uncrowned king of indian cricket. best of luck for future & happy birthday too 2 rahul dravid all hail to king dravid
VRV Singh is a waste bowler. He is very much hyped by media. UP all rounder pravin kumar is better than VRV. Pravin is able to swing the ball both sides and also a handy batsman..
RE:VRV Waste
by chris on Jan 11, 2008 09:47 AM
they're both India, they both suck, it's just a question of who sucks more or less, and at this stage against Australia it doesn't matter, maybe it matters against bangladesh.
RE:VRV Waste
by siddhartha on Jan 11, 2008 11:38 AM
chirs dude, the fact still rmeains that if the 10-12 odd utterly blatantly awfull decisions had not gone ozzie favor india would have had a very good chance at winning the 2nd match.
Aussie is the best team in world by far and there is no shame in going down to them fighting. India has lost both tosses, and then awfull spell of umpiring(and lack of integrity from ozzie players), is why india lost that match(apart from maybe below par performance on last day which too was greatly aided by seemingly bribed umpires).
RE:RE:VRV Waste
by siddhartha on Jan 11, 2008 11:39 AM
your own media and sporting greats are lambasting your team and umpires, we dont have to do it :)
There's a billion of you little monkeys playing the game, your BCII or whatever it's called is cash strapped up while the people starve so you can't blame lack of funds, yet your side scoring 300 runs against a make shift uni Australian team is some achievement and rallying cry. So I ask, what is the reason? Why are Indians so utterly terrible at cricket? What do you think?
RE:Why are India so bad at cricket?
by chris on Jan 11, 2008 10:01 AM
Cricket survived perfectly fine before the advent of the consumerism in India reaping every last cent from the game that they could, thank you very much.
RE:Why are India so bad at cricket?
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 11, 2008 10:06 AM
chris, how adre u to say billions of little monkey ?? u fker, all aussis r looser and race of monkey ??
last time, i visited auss, i came to know how ugly they r.. they r having 3rd grade mentality..idi00t.. and ausis babes are fine..all the time they sucked mine..
RE:Why are India so bad at cricket?
by Preeti Vikram on Jan 11, 2008 01:07 PM
Chris,
For Christ sake shut up. Do you know white chicks most of the time go for other coloured skins. I have lived in Africa and see how the white chicks go for those blacks.So nothing starnge if the whites chicks go for others.
RE:Why are India so bad at cricket?
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 11, 2008 10:27 AM
thats what, for money, ausiis looser can sell their mothers, dauthers and Gf..all
1.Wasim Jaffer c Ritchard b Higgs 92 2.Virender Sehwag c Higgs b Swards 24 3.Dinesh Kaarthick c Perera b Swards 25 4.Rahul Dravid c Crosthwaite b Perera 62 5.Yuvraj Singh c Dean b Perera 2 6.M S Dhoni c & b Ritchard 38 7.Irfan Pathan [Images] c Bulger b Swards 33 8.Harbhajan Singh c Crosthwaite b Bulger 0 9.RP Singh c Crosthwaite b Ritchard 12 10.Pankaj Singh not out 5 11.VRV Singh not out 4
So how is I.Sharma bowling?
Sorry, I am watching cricket after many years. Have the rules changed?
RE:Are they playing 12 a side?
by Lotiya Pathan on Jan 11, 2008 09:25 AM
eleven players can bat and eleven can field from tweleve. thats why we have ishnat in bowling..its practise match.
RE:Are they playing 12 a side?
by Karthik M on Jan 11, 2008 09:12 AM
As other bowlers, I.Sharma is also bowling with HAND, even after many decades...no change in bowling stragey!!!
But, the only change is umpires can also play in the game.
