if brett lee was hit...he had no right 2 poke his nose into their business..Lee is an intelligent guy and has enough sense to do the right thing. And anyways, bhajji is a sanskari indian lad n was targeted by Symonds coz he thought he was different from others coz he is a Sardar and it was intentionally done to create a rift in the team..Symonds hasnt shown any spirit of the game and the complex he has about his race has overcome him.
If Harbhajan hit Brett Lee intentionally, he should have been suspended. Why did Symmonds have to take "crack" at HS? Why not appeal to their very beloved umpire? I saw the incident on tele and there was no indication that HS hit Brett Lee on purpose or that he hit him at all. Can someone come clean with Symmonds and HS said? In the absence of such candor, one has to support HS. I agree that Symmonds' behavior is like a chattering monkey - that is no racial slur. We would not apply that to the great Aussie sportsman. Symmonds has only himself to blame. It is part of their psychological terrorism. BCCI should ban all sledging or import a coach from Australia (preferably Symmonds) to teach Indians sledging. Let us beat the Aussies at their own terrorism.
Can any body guess what Bhajji would have said? Let me guess. He said "Maine Ki Kitta?"(Maine Kya Kiya/What have I Done? in Punjabi.) and it seemed as 'Monkey' to Symonds. Any Comments Please
RE:What Bhajji Said?
by Max on Jan 13, 2008 06:34 AM
Why should he speak in Punjabi to Symonds? Symonds does not know that language...looks like a very lame excuse on the part of Indian sports officials.
CRICKET AUSTRALIA MEANS CRIMINALS ASSOCIATION.THIS ASSOCIATION AND ITS MEMBERS INCLUDING MEDIA ALWAYS HURT(ASSULT) THE EMOTIONS AND FEELINGS OF OTHER COUNTRY PLAYERS AND THRUOGH PLAYERS ITS PEOPLE PARTICULARLY ASIAN COUNTRIES LIKE INDIA, PAK, B.DESH SRI LANKA .
RE:CRIMINALS ASSOCIATION (CA)
by anand kumar on Jan 08, 2008 06:32 PM
But this time around even the australia media is against cricket australia. what does that mean. guess the aussie cricket team has surpassed the understanding and okaying of even their own media. hahahaha gr8 going ponting
You should be in the colaion force in Iraq, as you should back you soldier who are fighting a battle as you think you are a person who can defend his team mate, just imagine I a wild lion ran after Bret Lee , you would be the first person to leave the areana, do you interfere in your team mate Personal life as well, so please do not talk crap asa you are a big daam fool and please stop bullying Indian cricketers, please remove the notion from your head that we Indian are fools or dumb those days are gone when idiots like you took advantage of our good nature, so please change you dirty mindset to respect all human beings in whatever caste colour and creed.
RE:Lol at Harbajhan
by sri nivas on Jan 09, 2008 05:57 PM
a slight change in your comment..... its andrew symonds,who is sucking with those things..... rsymonds.... ru an expert in that? hooooo haaaaaa
RE:india should prove by performance
by Dev Purkayastha on Jan 09, 2008 02:23 AM
If Australia did not get the benfit of seven bad calls India would have one the game. Why should India's 500 score in the first innings be downplayed. Australia's first Innnigs score would have been at least 134 runs lower, if the umpire had made the correct call at 30 and 64. Australia is a great team, but bringing psychological terrorism on the field and procuring bad umpiring takes a great deal away from their credibility. If you noticed nobody in India complained about the first test, which Australia won fair and square. What are the Aussies afraid of?
RE:RE:india should prove by performance
by Andrew Symonds on Jan 09, 2008 12:02 PM
After all the drama, one has to accept that India's real problem is still Cricket.
RE:india should prove by performance
by LOL on Jan 08, 2008 10:28 PM
U stupid Pakistani. U try to win one test match against Australia and then u can talk abt India. Ur team is bleeding and u have no rights to talk abt the magnificient Indians, who beat you all ends up just two months ago.
Symonds refers to the slap by Harbhajan on Bret Lee's backside as the trigger to his response to Harbahajan which in turn provoked Bhajji's response. My question is does Symonds hold the rights to the Bret Lee's botttoms that he can't bear anyone else having a snide at it?
RE:Aussie Crybabies
by parveen baig on Jan 09, 2008 04:58 PM
SOrry its not a slap but a pat on back like its okay buddy i know the feeling of being hit for four by no.9 batsman
