Why no one is talking about match fixing. it seems that Australia can do any thing for winning the match. They would have bribed the umpires else how can all the umpires of the match can go against us? I as indian smells something is wrong. Rest upto you guys to take forward.....
RE:Controversy or match fixing
by Sudarshan on Jan 09, 2008 03:45 PM
you are probably the first person i have heard who has brought this issue up .. i was just about to say the same.
The whole of US calls Bush a chimp (and the pope as a orangutang). No one considers it racist. By calling monkey as racist, the albino xian scums are actually making fun of the original natives of australia whuich these scums have occupied. So symonds is in fact making fun of himself.
RE:Even if someone called Symonds a monkey, how can it be termed racist?
by bhagy lakshmi on Jan 09, 2008 05:11 PM
Mr.Ekalavya , You are absolutely right.If calling 'someone monkey is racism' then atlest 70% of our Indians do cal somebody monkey every other day, so we r racist!!!!! Well that's a greattt joke of the year!!. Infact we would request Harbhajan and his teammates not to do such a sin by calling Symonds or any other bloody idiot Aussies cricketers 'Monkey or Vanar' becose its totally disgraceful for Our own "Ramabhakt hanumanji and his entire race" and "hanumanji" will be angry to us for that. One more request to PAAJI and the INdian Team, just forget all these stupid mental game that Ponting and his team along with the help of Australian media is making, "Recognise the fact that Inside there mind they r afraid of atleast few of Indian players like PAAJI, Sachin, Kumble, Dravid, Laxman. so they just want to take your concentration out of the game, and win cheaply. PLEEEEESEEEEE don't be a party to it and Just go out n the Middle, Concentrate n Play your natural Game ' Give them Nicely Through ur Bowling,Batting and Fielding. Let them learn the Lessons of Patience and Tolerence through UR performance... Sachin, Ganguly, Dravid, Laxman, Kumble ,Saheer, Harbhajan last but nt least Yuvi, "Come on CHAK DE ! CHAK DO AUSTRALI KO BAKI DO KHELOM MEM & IN THE ONE DAYS" WE R HERE TO SUPPORT U & PRAY FOR UR TEAM! hurrayyy
(1)Ricky Ponting %u2013 (THE TRULY GENUINE CRICKETER OF THE CRICKET ERA AND WHOSE INTEGRITY SHOULD NOT BE DOUBTED) should be considered as the FOURTH UMPIRE. As per the new rules, FOURTH UMPIRE decision is final and will over ride any decisions taken by any other umpires. ON-FIELD umpires can seek the assistance of RICKY PONTING even if he is not on the field. This rule is to be made, so that every team should understand the importance of the FOURTH UMPIRE.
(2)While AUSTRALIAN TEAM is bowling, If the ball flies anywhere close to the AUSTRALIAN FIELDER(WITHIN 5 metre distance), the batsman is to be considered OUT irrelevant of whether the catch was taken cleanly or grassed. Any decision for further clarification should be seeked from the FOURTH UMPIRE. This is made to ensure that the cricket is played with SPORTIVE SPIRIT by all the teams.
(3)While BATTING, AUSTRALIAN players will wait for the ON-FIELD UMPIRE decisions only (even if the catch goes to the FIFTH SLIP as the ball might not have touched the bat). Each AUSTRALIAN batsman has to be out FOUR TIMES (minimum) before he can return to the pavilion. In case of THE CRICKETER WITH INTEGRITY, this can be higher.
(4)UMPIRES should consider a huge bonus if an AUSTRALIAN player scores a century. Any wrong decisions can be ignored as they will be paid huge bonus and will receive the backing of the AUSTRALIAN team and board.
(5)All AUSTRALIAN players are eligible to keep commenting about all players on the field a
Can any body guess what Bhajji would have said? Let me guess. He said "Maine Ki Kitta?"(Maine Kya Kiya/What have I Done? in Punjabi.) and it seemed as 'Monkey' to Symonds. Any Comments Please
Dissapointed, is the word one can say. Nuetrality of umpires are surely questionable. Mr. Condon should b brought in to enquire why the umpires were so reluctant to favour with their decisions to Australian team. Even after admitting to the media by Mr. Proctor, that umpires didnt heard n e thing, no evidence on tape either, how can he take it for granted that Michael Clarke & Mat Heyden were telling truth. Clarke's integrity can surely be questioned because twice in the match he has not found in true spirits of the game. What made Mr. Speed to come out with solutions after a world wide cry was made for the match. Being the supreme body for world cricket, a strong condemnation was necessary from ICC. If ICC has some sanity still left in them, they must CANCEL the Sydney test match. Documented with so many intentional wrong decisions and favouritism, it can not be said to be a TEST MATCH played between two international teams. ITS A SHAME THAT ICC WAS SPEECHLESS FOR TWO DAYS. A COMPLETE ENQUIRY MUST BE MADE FOR THESE ANOMALIES. BRING IN MR. CONDON TO ENQUIRE.
by Sameer joseph on Jan 08, 2008 10:17 AM | Hide replies
Seems like rest of india the whole cricketing world is jealous of Big3 (SACHIN,DRAVID,SOURAV) of india. they are jealous of Big 3's records and worry that these 3 will break all the records of thier national heros... Thats why all these umpires and referees are always against Big 3's of india,... Even Chappel tried and somewot succceded in breaking the integrity of Big3. and integrity of our nation..
It was a test match of the 3 famed "monkeys" of Gandhi Monkey 1 : See no evil This is jointly shared by Ricky Ponting, Michael Clarke, Steve Bucknor and Mark Benson Monkey 2 : Hear no evil Bucknor gets his 2nd prize here - this time no sharing business! Monkey 3 : Speak no evil Awarded jointly to Symonds (for the original) and Hayden (for eye-witness... rather ear-witness)
