This lose of Australia clearly indicated that the maximum no. of times they won the match is batting first and in this series also, it is the second time they batted second and lost the match.
RE:sri lankan lions
by Arjun Balachandran on Mar 01, 2008 11:08 AM
australia was the same place where murali was treated badly and was called a chucker.
RE:sri lankan lions
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Mar 01, 2008 04:04 PM
aussies are no doubt the champions...its indiancricketteam who stands No.2 always (as per you context). No.2, is a renowned position in business, conglomerates, opinions, etc...lol...keep it all for yourself.
RE:sri lankan lions
by Black on Mar 02, 2008 04:00 PM
I wonder what cry babies australians will cry about now after being hammered by lankans? May be they will say.... Ponting far^ted while facing lankans. ICC did not did anything to clear the smell so it bothered other australians and they got out. Blame it on ICC guys...
RE:sri lankan lions
by Another Indian on Mar 01, 2008 12:47 PM
:-) so a loser getting a guard of honour?.. so why would a mad weed monkey boy not get the same honour? Are you chairing the honours committee for the Aussies, Ritwik?.. :-)
AUSSIES HATE TO LOSE ESPECIALLY FROM WINNING POSITION ...TODAY THEY MUST BE FEELING VERY STUPID! JUST TTHE KIND OF DEFEAT THAT CAN "IRRITATE" A SIDE LIKE AUSTRALIA BEFORE THE FINALS
RE:INDIAN TEAM WILL BE HAPPY WITH THIS RESULT
by Another Indian on Mar 01, 2008 12:52 PM
And when they are beaten in the deciders itself like in the last VB series by the English, then what do they become?.. :-) By the way strong and invincible = cannot be overcome easily or at all.. So in my humble opinion, the England team was invincible last year.. But its just my thougts, you may still think otherwise. But what does it show YOUR comments as?.. :-) Cheers!
RE:Stupid Aussies lose!!!!
by Another Indian on Mar 01, 2008 12:34 PM
Weeping?.. :-) Laughing is more like it.. Do you seriously think Haydo's free entertainment on Brisbane Radio would have failed to cheer up the gloomiest soul?.. :-)
Please do not underestimate and demean Haydo's skills so cavalierly Ritwik.. He might take offence on this.. :-)
However, cheers, and see you tomorrow.. expecting some exciting finals..
It looks like there are not enough youngsters going for cricket in Australia because they are into so many other games. All they have is oldie Hayden, Ponting and Symmo. Young Tait came but poor guyis in trouble. If they had talented youngsters they would have definitely played them.
RE:Aussies only have veterans
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Mar 01, 2008 11:52 AM
Guys like you have been saying that Australia has weakened.. you know what...you losers are saying this for over a decade...started off when taylor, fleming departed...continued on with mcgrath, warnie....now probing onto ponting, hayden, ....
You have any idea when srinath, prasad, kiran more, manoj prabakar, ashish nehra...were representing India...If you think these guys are worthless it shows what team you had once...on the contrary if you think these guys in indian team are capable...yes...they were a capable losers all time...
You still gain credit in saying STRONGLY that aussies are invinvibles ALWAYS...thats it.
RE:Aussies only have veterans
by Another Indian on Mar 01, 2008 12:38 PM
invincible = very difficult to overcome?. .. i presume?
Under what situation does Aussie display so far qualify for that adjective Ritwik? 2 losses in prelims, bundled out below or sightly above 200 at least 4 times if not more.. Top bowlers being swatted for more than 50 off 10 overs regularly.. If you still continue using the adjective invincible, it will be a severe insult to Border, McDermott, McGrath, Warne, Slater, Waughs, Bevan etc..
Still this is a free country, and you can use any adjectives you wish to.. Just that not many will agree with you.
RE:Aussies only have veterans
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Mar 01, 2008 02:50 PM
Too smart pretending Another Indian....i know you draw a salary from a foreign company not indian origin... you could (as always) defend your arguments by diverting the perspective..carry on mate (?)...
And did i hear bundled out for around 200... i mean, you mean Indian team too..guy don't forget...wait for sunday...
RE:RE:Aussies only have veterans
by Ritwik Bhuyan on Mar 01, 2008 02:53 PM
And they have always been a better team than India (presuming you are a IndiaCricketTeam guy), now won't you agree?
RE:Aussies learned to bite the dust
by Another Indian on Mar 01, 2008 12:45 PM
So you agree that Aussies have not "learned", but "learnt" to bite the dust and so it will "be" useful for them to bite the dust again in the finals against India?
Thanks for agreeing wholeheartedly with space's logic, Ritwik, though I apologize on his behalf for some typos (which I have noticed even in your messages from time to time.. :-)
