RE:LOL
by ben hur on Mar 01, 2008 11:03 AM
rediff is for those who want to hv time pass (time waste). instead of constructive discussion, they start vomiting their venom.
Pakistan team is ready, Newzealand team is ready and West Indies team also ready. Next will be australian team for ICL. Already more than 7 players r in ICL team. Just prepare England, Srilanka & South Africa team and kick out ICC from cricket history.
RE:ICL
by krissh on Mar 01, 2008 08:52 AM
And allow BCCitobe the most bullshitted cricketboard in the world and politicise cricket more than what it is doing now.
RE:ICL
by Ram on Mar 01, 2008 08:06 AM
yes, i am also waiting for that day. Its not too far. Then ICL will emerge as a force to reckon with, free of r*cism (like ICC) and impotency (like BCCI)
RE:TOPIC is about Gillespie not Sachin!!
by INDIAN on Feb 29, 2008 09:23 PM
agreed that topic of discussion was deviated, but the reply was to SILLY criticizers of sachin, NOT to argue that cricket=sachin. And this isnt any professional blog, to stick to the specified topic, this is a casual chatting forum, hence dont over work your brain about sticking to the topic.
When many people say how many of Sachin's hundreds have come for a winning cause, Here is analysis of each of those centuries he scored when INDIA lost and reason why it went in vain.
When many people say how many of Sachin's hundreds have come for a winning cause,Here is analysis of each of those centuries he scored when INDIA lost and reason why it went in vain. Out of the 41 hundreds, 11 hundreds have gone in vain.
1. 137 off 137 (Strike rate 100) balls Vs SriLanka at Delhi in 1996 World Cup. India scored 271/3 in 50 overs. The only other 50 score was from Azhar. SL made 272 in 48.4 overs. Manoj Prabhakar had 4-0-47-0. He also opened in the innings and scored 7 of 36 balls. 2 . 100 of 111 Balls Vs Pak in Singapore- Apr 96. India 226 all out in 47.1 overs, When Sachin was out score was 186/4 (We cant blame because next 3 are match fixtures) . Pak had a reduced target of 187 from 33 overs. 3. 110 of 138 Balls (Slower but...) vs Sri Lanka In Colombo - Aug 96. Again India 226 for 5 in 50 overs, Only other 50 score from Azhar (58 of 99 balls !!!) .Sachin has also bowled 6-0-29-1 , the second most economical bowler and the only wicket taker (SL were 230/1 in 44.2 ) of the match next to Srinath. 7 bowlers were used by Azhar. 4. 143 of 131 Balls (!!!) Vs Aus at Sharjah, Apr 1998. This was chasing under lights. The qualifying match before the final. The whole world knows about this match. Still one interesting point, when Sachin was out India were 242 at 5 at
RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by sanket on Feb 29, 2008 05:43 PM
4. 143 of 131 Balls (!!!) Vs Aus at Sharjah, Apr 1998. This was chasing under lights. The qualifying match before the final. The whole world knows about this match. Still one interesting point, when Sachin was out India were 242 at 5 at 43 overs. Target was 276 in 46. Still India finished at 250/5 scoring just 8 of the next 3 overs. Great performance by Laxman and Kanithkar indeed. 5. 101 of 140 Balls against SL at Sharjah in Oct 2000. Indian score was 224/8 in 50 overs. (No other 50 score) . SL got 225/5 in 43.5; Sachin also bowled 5-0-22-0, better economy rate than everyone except Srinath. 6. 146 of 153 Balls against Zimbabwe at Jodhpur - December 2000 (Game of Dougla Mariliar) India made 283 / 8 in 50 overs. Sachin was the last man to be dismissed, score was 235/8 at 46.3 overs when he was out. Agarkar and Zaheer Khan propelled India to 283 in the last 3.3 overs. When Sachin has scored 146 of 235 in 46.3 overs, you can guess what the other 8 great batsmen were doing against the World class Zimbabwe attack. Second Highest scorer was Zaheer Khan with 32. Zim got 284/9 in 49.5 overs. Kumble bowled the last over. Sachin also got 6-0-35-1 7. 101 of 129 Balls Vs SA at Johannesburg - Oct 2001 India got 279/5 in 50, Ganguly made 127 of 126 balls. When Ganguly got out, the score was 193-1 in 35.2 overs. Sachin was the last man to get out at 263. SA got 280 in 48.4 overs. Sachin bowled 9-0-51-0, second best in economy rate next only to Agarkar (10-0-45-1)
RE:RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by sanket on Feb 29, 2008 05:46 PM
8. 141 of 135 balls Vs Pak at Rawalpindi, March 2004 India was chasing 329 and was 317 all out in 48.4 overs, 8 balls to spare. No other batsman made even a 50 (when chasing 300 ) and when Sachin was out, India were 245-4 in 38.4 overs. They needed 85 from 68 balls with 6 wickets in hand. 9. 123 of 130 Balls vs Pak at Ahmedabad, April 2005. India made 315/6 in 48 overs (48 over match), again no other 50 score. Second highest was Dhoni 47 of 64 balls, (third highest was extras - 39). Pak made 319 in 48 overs. The three quicks (Balaji, Nehra and Khan went for 188 runs from 26 overs between them taking only 2 wickets). Sachin bowled 6-0-36-1. No Harbhajan and no Kumble. 10. 100 of 113 Balls Vs Pak at Peshawar, Feb-2006. India were 328 all out in 49.4 overs. Pathan and Dhoni got 60 each. When Sachin was out when India were 305-5 in 45 overs. Managed only 23 in the last 5 overs.Pak scored 311/7 in 47 overs and won by D/L method. Could have been anybody's game. Sachin did not bowl. 11. 141* of 148 balls vs WI at Malaysia. India made 309 /5 in 50 overs. Sachin was not out. Pathan was the only other 50 scorer. WI made 141/2 in 20 overs and won by D/L method. Again could have been anybody's game.
RE:RE:RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by sanket on Feb 29, 2008 05:46 PM
In the other 31 instances India has won 30 times and once there was no result. Now, please think again when you say sachin's 100s were in the losing cause and that he is not a team player. It is a fact that for the entire 90's India played International cricket with 1 PLAYER and 10 JOKERS.
RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by shaik shahi hussain on Feb 29, 2008 07:11 PM
I agree he has been the fantastic player for INDIA so far. I have seen the SHARJAH match and i can say no other batsman could have done that in those days.
Only Gibbs has done it chasing 434 made by australia.
But can you also highlight the stats where Sachin has failed miserably while chasing in important matches??
I appreaciate he's a great player. Now he should retire in his peak so that his greatness remains instead people showing him door at the end of his career
RE:RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by Philo on Feb 29, 2008 10:41 PM
after all the above posted b s***, the number of times he won THE champinships still stays ZERO. End of story or history. Whichever way one wants to call it
RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by on on Feb 29, 2008 11:40 PM
so if u become a brainless guy when u are 60 when u had been a rocket scientist all ur life before, does that make it end of story of ur life? stupid fool with no brains u r !
RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by INDIAN on Feb 29, 2008 05:54 PM
awesome reply to crazy criticizers of sachin. excellent stats compilation man. Indians really dont know how to respect their hero. keep it up buddy.
RE:RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by rahul on Mar 01, 2008 03:22 AM
abe jaa be , sachin ne century maar ke kuch nahi ukhada, u talking as if ur his personal PA , wake up and read the current situation , "SACHIN was a brilliant player a few years ago" for the past 2 years all he is doing is trying to pile on to his record to make it unattainable, nor is he contributing when the team needs nor is he able to face good quality bowling now adays , indian people just dont know how to quit ,unless they are shown the door will they move
RE:Sachins centuries .. not for winning cause ???
by google lover on Mar 01, 2008 03:30 AM
so do u want to quit this world on ur own or do u need our help to show u the door to hell?
RE:2021
by himanshu puranik on Feb 29, 2008 02:58 PM
touch wood ...we all indians wud love to see that happen...afterall he is r most beloved cricketer.....(i dont care if those comments wer sarcastically made....ne ways who cares??)
RE:RE:2021
by raj on Feb 29, 2008 04:01 PM
Thanks thats a wonderful dream man millions love it to happen great thinking , even people like u r also getting some beautiful dreams