it was a very good match and newzealand in the recent times has really done well in chasing huge scores.what about India...come on India...new guns can also do it for India.
This is the biggest blunder by rediff. Even if they mean that 340 was chased by only New Zealand and Australia, still it's not right. Its not Australia, Its South Africa which chased down the total of 423 or so made by Australia. Again the same New Zealand have chased down a total of 350 or so againt Australia. I think Australia also have acheived the feet once.
This is not expected one the team batting 2 is chased this much score in newzland pitch and the england players played well in newzland pitch 250 is the highest total but the england players scored very well
New Zealand are one of only two teams to have chased more than 240 runs to win a one-day international, achieving that feat against Australia a year ago.
friends u make out ur mind on standards of rediff.when i went through the scorecard morning in the scorecard they showed few fours against collingwood.but he hit only sixers.no fours.
RE:that is rediff
by Radha V on Feb 20, 2008 02:41 PM
You please improve your standards of knowledge too. New zealand 'have chased more than 340 runs to win', not 240 runs.
RE:that is rediff
by Rajeev on Feb 20, 2008 03:34 PM
Radha... He asked Rediff's standard !!! Why are you here if you dont know anything abt cricket ???
RE:that is rediff
by Jagannadh Raju on Feb 20, 2008 10:28 PM
She didn't read the article. So she is confused. She is just following the messages of Heroes.
"Have some good Editing Team...if not then pay me 50K per month and I will work for you people to check spelling mistakes and such kind of blunders".... its 340 and not 240 in 6th line from below.
