i am of the opinian that about this matter if any player did any types mistake so ICC take some dicesion against player but umpire give wrong dicesion so why icc do not take any type of dicesion against umpire.according to icc should be make some rule against umpire if he give any wrong dicesion than also do fine it should be compulsary like a player while game result would change by his one wrong dicesion.
RE:Rohit Sharma fined for dissent
by Indian on Feb 13, 2008 09:56 AM
No. This is Spanish language. Not "a" Spanish language. You are really funny as pointed out by Yash.
Trying to find faults just with someone's words though you have clearly grasped his intent. Yet in your fault finding exercise, you make a blunder.. :-)
RE:poll
by Indian on Feb 09, 2008 02:20 AM
Who is the opponent? Are the above people tennis players, to be selected against Hewitt? It's a 11 member cricket squad. So maybe none of the above?
RE:indian players just dont get it, do they ?
by Indian on Feb 09, 2008 02:22 AM
Yes .. Indian players just don't get it that they are not Ponting or Clarke. You need to first migrate to Australia, then get their citizenship, then get selected in their national team, and THEN you can start doing whatever (showing dissent?.. such a pathetic small frivolous feat?).. Yup. they are so stupid.
Re: RE:indian players just dont get it, do they ?
by Sunil Vaidya on May 13, 2010 03:27 PM
hope against pseudos reads this! He will be absolutely livid!
RE:poll
by Doogie Hauser on Feb 08, 2008 01:59 AM
Mate, theres only one Indian that Oz would take and thats Sharma. Singhs o.k. Sreesanth is too much trouble (and has injury problems). The rest are struggling to be handy. Sharma may be Indias best bowler now, but keep his head on straight and he'll be the best in the world in 2 years. He's potentially that good.
RE:poll
by john on Feb 08, 2008 07:27 AM
I do not see anything special in Sharma to be best in the world. I see no potential even. At times he is worest than a school boy bowling in the nets. We need to be serious when we assess the overall talent and consistancy.RP by far impressed everybody along with Pathan. Therefore, I do not agree at least with the present showing that he will become world class or best in the world.
RE:poll
by Indian on Feb 09, 2008 02:26 AM
Well John: Doogie is talking about Ishant Sharma, not Rohit Sharma.. And by the way, both of you can decide whom do you like or dislike, but its not gonna change whether he is (or someone else is) India's great bowler. For all I might think about the shortcomings of Clarke (and his bat goes high here, tilts there, he opens the face wrong, his feet don't move, his hairstyle is crap.. etc.) he does score runs, and even if I label him an absolute washout, he will be what he will be. So chill out.
RE:poll
by Indian on Feb 11, 2008 04:15 AM
And my apologies for not towing your line.. :-) I too forgot that this was a discussion board.. Should have reckoned that this is a "Agree with Aussies at all costs" board.. :-) Cheers!
RE:poll
by Doogie Hauser on Feb 09, 2008 03:00 PM
If thats what you think then fantastic. Hopefully the Indian selectors will think the same and leave him at home on future tours of Oz.
RE:poll
by Indian on Feb 11, 2008 10:01 AM
Yeah absolutely Doogie. As a devout Aussie, you are certainly entitled to pray for Sharma (Ishant) being kept out of this Indian side.. :-) No wonder you are praising John. :-)
Aussies are very fair and very professional & follow the rules to the 'T' when it comes to judging an opposition for decent and reprimanding him, only when it comes to judging their own players, the rule book goes for a toss & a cheat in them comes out, Jekyll & Hyde dual personality.
How come we haven't heard from the likes of asshish, chris etc. on the whinging nature of the Indians? We people are disappointed at this lax nature of your vigilance... :-) If you sleep on the job (of saving the world honour from these radical Indians), how is the world order going to be restored? Wake up mates.. :-)
For those of you who like to cheer every small little thing, go take a look at the current points table: India is leading at the top with 4 points.. for whatever it's worth.. ;-) :-)
Since recently India appealed strongly against Bhajji and the RACISM issue, and WON that APPEAL!! I think ICC has decided that they won't let India out easily. Even if India is already on the receiving END (not to mention thats more than often anyway) of bad umpiring. Koetzen is another exampel of an Umpire losing his decision making skills and judgemental senses with age, but then again if INDIA now was to raise their voice yet again, the whole of th world and even half the INDIANS will start criticising INDIA of flexing their FINANCIAL MUSCLE. This is so pathetic, being an indian living in Australia, my blood boild wheneevr India is put through the sword. YET Andy Symonds, Matty Hayden, Michael CLARKE, and Ponting all get away for doing all these things time and again!!!! WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY WHY?????????? What is the world doing now???? COWARDS thats all you people are....RAMA kya Ghor Kalyug hai!! "Hans chuge Dana-tinka, Kauwa Moti khaaye".
RE:Why fine Rohit when he wasn't wrong in showing disbelief???
by Indian on Feb 07, 2008 10:42 AM
Hey Mr. On: Calm down sir.. Whilst you have the right to be indignant, it's not in our nature of criticizing umpiring, however pathetic it may turn out to be. Well not always.. For instance, we didn't complain against the third umpire in Sydney test, did we? And so we shall not against Crowe, though he has had the benefit of the replays, yet chooses to fine Rohit. So as I said, we shall not complain. In face, Indians should set an example of "walking" in the next match against Australia. And how? "Walk" after hitting a four. That's how. Then let us enjoy the spectacle these excellent umpires will have to exhibit - that of "informing" the scorers how to record the "dismissal" of the said batsman.. :-) And THEN let's watch.. :-)
RE:Why fine Rohit when he wasn't wrong in showing disbelief???
by laaloo yaadav on Feb 07, 2008 12:57 PM
indians r not united against the self-respect. rather dont care much for it. so its too much to expect protests from them. if they can take back compalint againt brad hogg n listen to whatever rubbish hurled at us, dont expect any protests from cowards.
