Just because he landed back to play Mumbai carnage, media is soft him and found Asad Raug as scapegoat....Thanks media.....we have had enough from you....Few years from now, people will start recognizing a true media (un-biased)and will follow that one only, the other masala will be be totally neglected....some of recognizing or un-biased newspaper you can see around is THE HINDU and near to perfect is NDTV 24x7....and if you have time to see any news watch this out....and avoid politically motivated media....Pietersen could have kept quiet and it happens in cricket especially with straight umpires, he sees first and then hears (light travels faster than sound) and 70% of his decision is made up by then....then with the shout from WK, SP (silly point) and FSL he may tend to lose that small nick sound .....one should not claim benefit of doubt, this time it went with bowler....anyway 'well palyed Pietersen and Asad'....Good Day !!!!
Now TV Channels, Cricket Highlights, Bollyood, Hollywood and Dubbed movies everything at pla ce4smart dot com Now TV Channels, Cricket Highlights, Bollyood, Hollywood and Dubbed movies everything at pla ce4smart dot com
Had an Indian Umpire Given Pietersen Out, then The ICC would have Banned him for Life. Only Pakistan umpires & Steve Bucknor are Recognized as Global Standard by The ICC Elite Umpire panel.
Just cannot understand, it's such a strong heading to say, "Pieterson fumes..". And you read the content, he is very balanced in what he says. He is just contending that he played it down the on-side, where's the content, where he is fuming?????
Please report what is talked about, instead of adding your own masala.
Re: Heading and actual comments are different.
by ps subramanian on Dec 22, 2008 10:31 AM
Raj Reddy has made a strong and valid point. Unfortunately, the media is always on the look-out for opportunities to create sensation. In this chase of sensation, they often end up distorting the actual facts and also foment discord. There is absolutely no doubt that the heading for this news should have been different.
Re: Heading and actual comments are different.
by Subhash Bose on Dec 22, 2008 10:33 AM
I agree with Raj Reddy. This kind of reporting is unfair to one and all. Journalism without sensationalism will make rediff a better site.
Re: Heading and actual comments are different.
by Super Star on Dec 22, 2008 10:37 AM
You are right. But for the heading, you and I may not have taken pains to read the interview. So this is nothing but the media's effort to draw attention by sensationalising trivial things, something we have been seeing on TV since last so many years.
Re: Re: Heading and actual comments are different.
by ravi shankar on Dec 22, 2008 01:14 PM
I agree. This is the outcome of capitalistic society. There is more selling than worth. India is heading towards the same culture. US has seen its downfalls but refuses to learn.
Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by Rahul Prasad on Dec 22, 2008 10:16 AM
when u get a wrong decision everyone one cries ...its human nature ...how many time inida would have cried for wrong decision...be matrued then talking nonsense...more over england r damn professionals ....blasts r happening everywhere but still they came we shd really encourage them. Just think BCCI they just told NO to pak tour. Grow up man...have a life
Re: Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by Kamina on Dec 22, 2008 10:22 AM
parsad faltu will slap u with shoe of kp if u talk like a gyaniji. now take out the thumb from ur mouth and wash ur hands.
Re: Re: Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by Faltu on Dec 22, 2008 10:23 AM
England came to play as they were sure that terrorism is not the being planned up here in India, where as every body know that Pakistan is the center of Terrorism, they why any one goes, if the same things has happened in Pakistan, I bet England team have came back after the attack.
and when you are taking abt the human nature, stop talking about the professionalism, okay.
Re: Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by Faltu on Dec 22, 2008 10:23 AM
England came to play as they were sure that terrorism is not the being planned up here in India, where as every body know that Pakistan is the center of Terrorism, they why any one goes, if the same things has happened in Pakistan, I bet England team have came back after the attack.
and when you are taking abt the human nature, stop talking about the professionalism, okay.
Re: Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by Raj Reddy on Dec 22, 2008 10:24 AM
Are you comparing England touring India and India touring Pakistan???
Mamu... Pakistan sent people who set off blasts in India.
If India sent folks to England to setoff blasts, England won't send a team, they would have sent the bombers to bomb the crap out of us, unlike us.
Re: Re: Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by Faltu on Dec 22, 2008 10:26 AM
Tell this to Immature Rahul Prasad, I think KP brought Lollipop for him from England.
Re: Even I got the LBW wicket many times
by ps subramanian on Dec 22, 2008 10:35 AM
Kevin Peiterson is a maverick. He does not have the refinement of a typical Englishman. He is blunt and has rough edges, which fact makes him culturally inferior.
Re: Re: Axis of Evil
by Kamina on Dec 22, 2008 10:23 AM
i have 4 camels in the desert and now they r also against the culture and prefer watching belly dancing.
Re: Axis of Evil
by Gopi on Dec 22, 2008 10:31 AM
We should call it ICBM (Inter Continental Ballistic Missle or Indian Cricket Bollywood Media - both technically meaning the same). LoL.
The question now is whether England captain would be penalised for his outburst against the umpire's decision giving him LBW. He is not suppose to judge where the ball might have gone. If it was an Indian the match refree would have been pounced on the issue by now. Even the bowler Swan has to be punished for his appeal to umpires which in most time very intimidating. It is sad that we are taking everything lightly because we have one victory already in our pocket.
Re: Peiterson
by Rahul Prasad on Dec 22, 2008 10:17 AM
we r taking lightly ...thats funny ...it was a bad decision and he openly said it...more over we indians dnt accept the facts ...if the same would have given to viru or sachin or dravid ...our media and we would have cried for the whole life...Grow up man...
Re: Re: Peiterson
by Kamina on Dec 22, 2008 10:25 AM
take in the spirit of game. it was a correct decision after watching it on hawk eye and umpires are also human. when strauss in previous match was clean lbw on bhajji delivery he was not given so its okay. if it was full blind decision then we can criticise. we indians are like you with a fake id.
Umpire is the undisputable judge. The players, not even captain should comment about that. Even the commendators should also avoid passing critical comment on umpiring.How difficult it is to judge the ball, Umpires only knows....!!!!
Re: cricket decision
by Jack Sparrow on Dec 22, 2008 10:05 AM
Will ur comment be the same if India were under same situation and a critical batsman gets out for wrong reasons(given out by PAKISTANI umpire..)..??
Re: Re: cricket decision
by Kamina on Dec 22, 2008 10:27 AM
In my view BCCI sd report the KP statement and punish him for bringing disrespect to umpire that also while match is on. It is offence as per cricket and also in ur pakistan.
Re: Re: cricket decision
by Raam on Dec 22, 2008 10:11 AM
Mr Iyer is right. How a player could decide on LBW decision?. Depending upon the guard taken by him, the player would decide to which direction ball is moving. But for umpire who stands behind the stump the vision is very clear hence he is the only person who can decide LBW correctly. When Peiterson expresses regret on the umpire's decision what is wrong in Iyer's argument in favour of Rauf?
Re: Re: Re: cricket decision
by Rahul Prasad on Dec 22, 2008 10:21 AM
LBW'S r the most decision where umpires can go wrong. So third umpire or batsman shd have a right to appeal. Yday was a crucial stuff becos KP was going in grt guns...look @ the six he has hit to bhaji and mishra ...they were strokes of the day...just dnt talk rubbish and support indians. More over talks facts then talking rubbish
Re: Re: Re: Re: cricket decision
by Kamina on Dec 22, 2008 10:30 AM
It was a pretty decent out after watching hawk eye. yes there was a marginal scope of benefit of doubt. Anyway it is not a wicket like that in perth which could have change the match outcome. More than that Indian batsman has suffered it more than any other country be it in Sarjah, England or offlate in Australia by Bucknor. So don't cry using a fake id. Read the post KP wishes that Ben of Doubt sd be used for his favour.
Re: Re: Re: Re: cricket decision
by Faltu on Dec 22, 2008 10:36 AM
the only fact is clearly visible to you from your 14 inch TV in a 1 BHK, 550 SQfeet house than the appointed umpire in the ground.
There are innumerable bad decisions again Sachin and many Indian players. Still they do not make such hues and cry.If he had doen so, it could have filled the newspapers.
Re: Sachin got out many times from bad decision
by Desert Bangalore on Dec 22, 2008 09:58 AM
Even if Asian Players in General get a bad Decision by an Umpire, it will be Played Down as "A Part of The Game & The Umpire is also a Human Being & can make errors".
However if it is a White Country, then the Trouble starts.
