New rule should come that no person should not be allowed to compete in election if any of the charges..criminal/corruption/etc... is against him presently or in past..
Re: Useless polititions
by Harendra roy on Dec 23, 2008 06:52 PM
Ir is a very good thought indeed. but it will provide a great chance to otherside an edge. coz whenever a good person choose to take a part in election, someone will come and file a case against him, n in this case the person will be automatically stopped to take part in election. hope u can understand what is my point to prove. Thanks
Re: Useless polititions
by krishnan on Dec 03, 2008 08:53 AM
why do you want a rule?if democracy is understood ,people should not elect them. after having elected them ( criminals) who do you think is going to make this rule you are talking about. are they going to pass a law against themselves?
Re: who the heck cares about this crap...talk about
by Kaushik Comments on Dec 02, 2008 04:43 AM
Everyone must do army service for 3 years to qualify for any work or do any business.
Compete in politics, setting retirement age to 55.
Re: Re: who the heck cares about this crap...talk about
by LION on Dec 02, 2008 11:30 AM
yes man politicians must have age limit.. and that to must be 50-55 and politics must be like a professional studys .. so the people who interested in politics must do as a graduation.. so like this we can teach politics as well as we can rectify corruption..
Re: Re: Re: who the heck cares about this crap...talk about
by Kumar on Dec 19, 2008 10:51 PM
IDOTS....... 1.last three days we are seeing what satyam did...(hiighy educated people). 2.All big infrastruvture projects we know how much corruption tata/ambanisa and mittal and what sort of work they giving. 3.exp:allcorpaorte run mobie operators we know how much manupalted bills... 4.we know how the corpoates taking business and fake charing to customers world wide.. 5.you people what the same corp ohh god u people r just mechalie sys educated people..... 6.go to kerela compare to other state less corruption even minister and cm have to saty in quie for temples and other needs..... even in big toll gate passed express high way we know...worst maintanace they have.... even so many.... 7.we know world wide all big corporate running defnce company are the worst corrupted people and they force to make good people from politic/buero in corruption
Re: Re: Most runs in test cricket
by Kunal shirishkumar kuvalekar on Dec 02, 2008 04:41 AM
u sure guys because I think that honour will go to some Indian.
Re: Re: Re: Most runs in test cricket
by ABINDER SHARMA on Dec 23, 2008 12:00 PM
Yes u r right, it is Maninder Singh who conceded more than 300 runs in an innings taking some 3 wkts.
Re: Re: Most runs in test cricket
by S CR on Dec 01, 2008 07:21 PM
Jason Krejza has conceded most runs in debut innings. But there may be some other bowler who had conceded most runs in an innings.
Re: Re: Re: Most runs in test cricket
by Santosh FS on Dec 22, 2008 08:18 PM
some former aussie player has conceded 298 runs. it was told when B. lee conceded 200 against india in sydney 2004.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Most runs in test cricket
by Guest on Dec 25, 2008 07:15 PM
Fleetwood-Smith. 87.0-11-298-1 against England in 1938. Rajesh Chauhan is second: 78.0-8-276-1 against Sri Lanka.
