The ICC is always on its toes to punish asian cricketers.The maximun number of punishments announced by ICC has been against Asian Teams. Teams like Australia get away easily with just warnings. Ricky ponting of australia questioned the umpires decision to call back sachin after he was given out.was that not a wrong thing under the ICC'S rule books?The icc should pull up its socks now & treat all teams equally & punish those found guilty. No country is bigger than the game of CRICKET.
If Inzi is not guilty...why the punishment? Darell hair shud be punished for bringing the game to disrepute..looks like they have arrived at a compromise to letoff inzi but punish him and inzi agrees not appeal...cmon inzi..be a man...pakistan team is known for fighters..
Inzy's punishment goes unjustified. He & the team didn't take field as they were alleged with ball-tampering charges. The sequence of events is important. Had Inzy brought the game into disrepute without any reason, this (the ban) goes down as a job well done. But, when the ultimate charge goes wanting for proof, this is just unacceptable.
obsession in believing that only australians and english are the best in everything shud be removed from our mindset. our tendency to hang on to each and everything without self respect, whether right or wrong,done efficiently or inefficiently by foreigners as above reproach shud be dispensed with.
why no action is taken against such prejudiced racially biased umpires and ban them for life.,
Unlike BCCI, every INDIAN and every honest cricket lover was with Inzy right from the beginning of this issue. Now as the truth has won its major battle against the racist ICC, will HAIR dare to apologise in public, as, Inzy had protested openly.
This contraversial issue is purely a racism against an asian and the asian team. the higher authority belong to different race and penalising the other race.
