Discussion Board

Dalmiya''s plea for time rejected


Total 16 messages Pages | 1
Ajit Welling
Criminal Proceesdings against Pawar
by Ajit Welling on Nov 12, 2008 08:48 PM

Is rediff editor sleeping?

This article is dated September 01, 2006 20:19 IST. The news heading is diffrent than the content.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Kalank Sharma
Cheap tactics
by Kalank Sharma on Nov 12, 2008 08:38 PM

Boycott rediff !! Its getting into the habit of luring readers by posting inflamatory headlines.. the content is ver different. Rediff ...please don't resort to such cheap gimmicks for publicity !!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Sumit Gupta
hahaha
by Sumit Gupta on Nov 12, 2008 08:31 PM

rediff pagla gaya hai

    Forward  |  Report abuse
pooja munim
Criminal Proceedings against Pawar or Dalmiya ? Is it a typo ?
by pooja munim on Nov 12, 2008 08:31 PM

What an error ?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Basanth
Rediff editor has really gone NUTS! BEST EXAMPLE
by Basanth on Nov 12, 2008 08:29 PM

Read if if you have nothing else to do.
Rediff Editor must explain.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
khiche kha
Here is the news:
by khiche kha on Nov 12, 2008 08:27 PM  | Hide replies

The Calcutta High Court on Monday directed initiation of criminal proceedings against Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI)
President Sashank Manohar, former Board President Sharad Pawar and four top officials for filing false affidavits in the Jagmohan Dalmiya expulsion case. ( Watch )

Justice Nadira Pathariya passed the order eight months after Dalmiya, a former BCCI president, moved a case of perjury against Pawar and Board officials and prayed for criminal proceedings against them for allegedly producing false documents in court.

The court passed the ex parte order and directed the Registrar (Original side) to initiate criminal proceedings under section 195 of CR P C (prosecution for contempt of lawful authority of public servants for offences against public justice and for offences relating to documents given in evidence), at an appropriate court.

The court then reserved its judgement. The other Board officials were Ratnakar Shetty (Chief Administrative Officer), Niranjan Shah (former secretary), N Srinivasan (Secretary) and Chirayu Amin, junior Cricket Committee Chairman.

Dalmiya's counsel submitted that the former Board chief had been suspended from the BCCI on the basis of an amendment that had not been registered.

In his petition, Dalmiya had alleged that the Board had placed forged documents before the High Court on condonation of the time of application for the registration of an amendment to BCCI's Clause V of Rule 38, which relates to punitive action

    Forward  |  Report abuse
khiche kha
Re: Here is the news:
by khiche kha on Nov 12, 2008 08:28 PM
against a member of the Board.

He contended that the BCCI had wrongly claimed to have received permission from the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration body to register the amendment at a later date.

Stating that an amendment must be registered within three months, Dalmiya's counsel submitted that the application for condonation of delay was filed six years after the amendment was made in September, 2000.

He contended that it was applied for only after suspension of the former Board chief, but had not been obtained then.

Dalmiya was suspended from BCCI by the Board on December 16, 2006 and subsequently forced to resign from post of Cricket Association of Bengal President.

Earlier, Dalmiya's counsel Satyabrata Mukherjee had submitted in April that the BCCI informing the high court in 2007 that the amendment had been duly done and registered, was to the contrary.

He had contended that the document produced before the court was signed by Ratnakar Sheity.

The case of perjury (lying or producing false documents before a court of law) was filed by Dalmiya on July 20, 2007, the day the high court had declared that his suspension from the Board was illegal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
amrithraj gopalan
Rediff
by amrithraj gopalan on Nov 12, 2008 08:23 PM  | Hide replies

Whats gone wrong with rediff??

    Forward  |  Report abuse
amrithraj gopalan
Re: Rediff
by amrithraj gopalan on Nov 12, 2008 08:25 PM
Rediff please check your article

   Forward   |   Report abuse
amrithraj gopalan
Re: Re: Rediff
by amrithraj gopalan on Nov 12, 2008 08:25 PM
Red iff please check your article.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
ravi kumar
REDIFF CHECK UR HEAD!!!!!
by ravi kumar on Nov 12, 2008 08:19 PM  | Hide replies

REDIFF CHECK YOUR HEADLINE!!!! AND UR HEAD
U SAY SOMETHING IN HEADING AND WRITE SOMETHING IN ARTICLE

    Forward  |  Report abuse
PATRIOT
Re: REDIFF CHECK UR HEAD!!!!!
by PATRIOT on Nov 12, 2008 08:21 PM
seems new gimmick...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
idris baxamusa
Re: REDIFF CHECK UR HEAD!!!!!
by idris baxamusa on Nov 12, 2008 08:26 PM
this seems to be happening quite often at rediff... how bad can this get.. cant even check their stuff before publishing...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Binoy Joseph
Re: REDIFF CHECK UR HEAD!!!!!
by Binoy Joseph on Nov 12, 2008 08:21 PM
Exactly! How can rediff even publish an article like this? If Mr. Pawar decided to sue rediff, you will have to shut shop!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 16 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message