Discussion Board

''We would have batted first''


Total 3 messages Pages | 1
J.Majumdar
Dravid's Costly Decision...
by J.Majumdar on Mar 20, 2006 09:32 PM

This third test match between India and England should be an eye opener for many, who are blindly backing up Rahul Dravid. No doubt, he is a great batsman in present cricketing world and one of our greatest among great batsmen of all time. I have no doubt about it, but his captaincy, though till in early stages, is lot to be desired.



For the reason best known to him and team management ( including coach Chapell), having won the toss, he decided to field with five regular bowlers in his team. This beats all logics for the game and crops up several probing questions. Particularly, it is senseless not to bat first ( there is no serious threat in the pitch, except fast bowling squad of England, who will there any way) and opt for fielding,......when England was beaten so comprehensively in the last test and India is one up now.



I fail to appreciate this strategy. If India would have batted on a clean slate and scored reasonable runs, definitely England would have been under pressure. Plus they had to play last when wickets would have worn much to give us an edge for another win. On the other hand, Dravid's illogical decision has put the team

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Narayan
What a stupid decision
by Narayan on Mar 19, 2006 11:39 AM

What a stupid decision Rahul took on his 100th Test..! Bah!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Dr T S Raman
Stupidity!
by Dr T S Raman on Mar 19, 2006 07:57 AM

Was Dravid "coached" by Chapell? His decision to field first was stupid.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 3 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message