I strongly believe that the super sub should be named after the toss. The playing 12 should be named before the toss and the super sub should be named after the toss. It is pitty that lots of good crickets are unused in the games. It is like 12 players vs 11 players. Those who win the toss have the advantage and this is not good. Look at the Africa Vs Asia Ashraf was substituted without facing a single ball. This is not good for the cricket. Super Sub should be named only after the toss.
Sports related activities are gradually turning into very powerful means for world re-making and world re-shaping. The multi-talented people of Africa and Asia have an important joint role to play in this grand enterprise of world re-making and world re-shaping. Cricketers from South Africa, Namibia, Kenya, Zimbabwe and from the East African countries could spread the message of goodwill, solidarity and fellow feeling to the people of other African countries who too are exceptionally good in soccer, long distance running and so on. Cricketing giants from Asia like India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are producing quality players and coaches who are promoting the game on a war footing in many countries of Asia and in the wider world. Cricket is a game and a way of life that inculcates values like patience, sense of timing, single-mindedness, motivation, perseverance, courage, sense of patriotism, solidarity, equality, fraternity and concern for life and dignity. Players like Shaun Pollock, Murlitharan, Inzi bhai and Anil Kumble are shining examples of those time tested lofty virtues. This Afro-Asia Cup is a meaningul avenue for bonding and fellow feeling for all of us. Thanks.
