Dear Sir/Madam: The above article articulates the inability of the scribe to make absolute comprehension of the subject written. If anybody apart from the scribe and the court and of course Mr. Dalmiya, can understand or even make any sense of what the crux of the article was, please dedicate another article explaning the same. More importantly, I don't understand if the scribe understands, that full stops are our friends and can be used as necessary. They are ofcourse to help the readers not sweat over a ridiculously simple matter. Please convey my deepest sympathy to the author and my good luck for future articles (I would be surprised at an effort though). My own understanding of the subject of the article was minimal when I started reading, but now I am hopelessly clueless as to who sued who and for what reason and who stayed what and more importantly who won or lost.....a typical nail biting India-Pakistan match for a soccer referee....absolutely clueless!!!! One positive comment about the article though is that you've successfully hidden the author's name. Good job, for it would've invited far more personal attacks, a highly detrimental factor for an author's growth-Vj
