We dont need to look too far to guess that its there if Australian shows dissent he'll be given warning if an asian shows dissent he'll be banned ..if an australian caught doping or mingling with bookies he will be handled by his own board and suspende for a yr or too..if an asian do the same he will be handled by the ICC itself claming its a disaster and he'll be suspended for life...its true and criceketing nations need to open there eyes..asians r contributing max to the board funds we can bring things to normal..or atleast to level playing field...i wonder did we ever complained y the pitches were so fast when we went to Austarlia or England as a mattter of fact so WHY there is so much of noise of foul play when we made the pitches favorable to spinners..they r bad losers ..and biased
Of the seven bowlers named, how is it that all of them belong to the subcontinent. How is it that no South Africans, Australians, Kiwis or Brits are on this list? If Shoaib features on the list, then so should Brett Lee. Why is Harbhajan there? Didn't the ICC almost end his career a few years ago? Their motton is clear to see - if one cannot outplay a person on the sportsfield, outwit them using fraudulent and cunning strategy on the political stage. Muralitharan's action is debatable, but no one can argue the fact that chucking has in no way whatsoever assisted Murali. All his wickets were a consequence of him put-foxing the batsmen, and not chucking. I can understand their fears when Shoiab runs through batting line-ups using raw pace, produced by bending this arm. But why Murali? And why not Lee?. Cricket is in turmoil and the world stands divided. The ICC should stop patronising the so-called "white" nations and begin to be more broad-minded. They are hurting the very sport they represent. The ICC needs consistency - they only ban and fine Indian players while Australians and English players walk away unscathed for the same action. Enough of this rascism!
