We have been reading, India is not in form. Is India not in form or the Indian Players? If it is India not in form, there should be no Cricket in India till the astros give a green signal about Rahu and Ketu. If it is Indian Players, then why not to replace them. Sehwag, Laxman, Sachin if cannt deliver, then why not to call the newscomers who are in form. In India we just are going on Ram Bharose. In Politics the slogans are Sonia Ji Aao Desh Bachaao and in Cricket Sachin Lao Team Bachaao. Is India dependant on individuals or team? Please give a thought to it dear Selectors and wake up. Cann't we produce 11 out of 110 crores Indians? Or we will remain Frogs of Well?
The Indian team has the best batting line up and the most experienced spinners
The Indian team needs to always plunge to the depths and received public backlash and then they realise their mistakes and play like champions.
Either they are at their lowest form or they play like beating the best. There is no consistency nor back up resistance / support if the main batsmen and bowlers do not perform.
Even if the team thinks for a minute about the enormous pride of playing for a country like India they would play some cricket and achieve minimum acceptable levels of consistency and not have such fluctuating erratic performance levels.
why r we keeping laxman in the side? Parthiv was bad in keeping wickets, i agree. So bring in Karthik in his place,thats alright. But he(parthiv) was much much better in batting compared to laxman...he always scored 30's or 40's or more. So why not keep both parthiv and karthik in team and kick out laxman???
RE:why keep laxman?
by Sreedhar on Nov 04, 2004 07:20 PM
Just Shut up!. Poor Laxman What he did?. whenever India loses Blame is going to Tendulkar and Laxman, What the Other fellows doing.
Ganguly and Co what they are doing, remove Ganguly first from the team, that is the correct solution.
