the heading given was "Sachin sets a new record". no mention of Sachin anywhere in the page. also one fails to understand what record Sachin could possibly have made in 32 runs that he scored in the second innings and 10-something in the previous.
also you have underquoted Harbhajan's achievement. his stats, the best so far, was truly achieved yest on eden gardens but the figures were 7wkts for 87.
cricket lovers would appreciate your articles more if they don't have silly lapses like the ones pointed above.
:)ur main page had a news link like "Sachin Tendulkar sets new record" but the relevant page did not contain any mention of `Sachin` prob.. ur link should have been "Shaun Pollock sets new record"
The link to this page reads "Sachin Tendulkar sets a New Record". In the page, there is no mention of Sachin, leave alone his record. This very misleading and I didn't expect this from Rediff
