It seems a one side game. if kale is guilty, he must be punnished but atleast one chance should have been given to defend. More and Roy must come forward if they have strong evidence.Every cricket lover is interested in present and past also.If these type of activities are happennig behind selection of a player in cricket team unfortunetly it is not a good sign for indian cricket.
How can you stop a player from playing it is against individual rights, & it is still to be proved that he has offered them money. There are all the chances that the secletors are telling lies.The best way to stop something like this happening is limit the role & responsiblity of the secletors so that they do not have the last say in finalising the team or secleting a paritcular candidate. There should be a systamitic procedure there players are judged as per their last 10 matches performances ( the criterias) 1st) Average in the last 10 maches 2nd) No of lifes or chances a batsmen got i.e a chanceless innings will be rated higher than a 100+ made with 1 or more lifes. 3rd) The kind of opposition played with.
If all this is taken into caosideration for secletion then the player will be chosen on his merits & not the fancy decisions of the secletors. Limit the role of secletors let them just be used as mear stam.
The maharashtra cricket assn is right in supporting kale.The selectors who accused kale must also take the lie detector test.They should prove kale's guilt. The bcci should show transperency in its affairs.
I think Kale is not Gilti, He is from middleclass family, Twenty lakh is higher value for his family, & he is crossing 30 age so his crcket life is no more so why he give this ammount for selection. kiran & pranav should give lie detector test.
