In 1700's during Shivaji we had all this Khan to handle: Afzal Khan Shahista Khan Fatte Khan Naamdar Khan Kartalab Khan Uzbek Khan Sadat Khan Bhai Khan Fazal Khan
And in 21st Century we have this: Shah Rhuk Khan
I dont understnd when this Khans will understand not to tickle the tiger..
Re: Then and Now
by Red Pascal on Feb 11, 2010 02:07 PM
Shivaji was a real warrior, who fought an army stronger than his, this tiger is old and attacks those weaker than itself.
Shah Rukh Khan starrer My Name Is Khan is set to become the first Indian film to hit the Egyptian theaters after a gap of 15 years.(yup d world is ready, india is ready....jet set go.......MNIK)
Re: Re: MNIK ready !
by narayanswamy nagarajan on Feb 11, 2010 02:07 PM
in gulf countries/middle east etc. most of the bollywood more so "B" grade film are welcome as they proide soft-porn entertainment to the starved locals.
Shah Rukh Khan starrer My Name Is Khan is set to become the first Indian film to hit the Egyptian theaters after a gap of 15 years.(yup d world is ready, india is ready....jet set go.......MNIK)
Re: if
by bharat on Feb 11, 2010 02:04 PM
how many such instances u need to prove ss is not the only one???????y give it communal color?????why cant it be an issue of some hurt sentimennts....y all minority shld come out in support with no one one the other side.......i guess u have ur say and that is fractured when it comes to other issues??????
Re: if
by bharat on Feb 11, 2010 02:05 PM
how many such instances u need to prove ss is not the only one???????y give it communal color?????why cant it be an issue of some hurt sentimennts....y all minority shld come out in support with no one one the other side.......i guess u have ur say and that is fractured when it comes to other issues??????
Re: if
by Red Pascal on Feb 11, 2010 02:14 PM
What else has the SS ever done except give it community/ marathi vs other colors ? What hurt sentiments, if someone's sentiments are hurt by SS and MNS does that give them the permission to attack their offices ? Rule of law should prevail, violence should not be used. Make an appeal if you want to for the film to be boycotted, let the people show their "hurt" do not vandalise screens and attack halls, all this is done to scare the public away, for in reality no one is really hurt by the remarks, it is just a political gimmick, and rule of law should be above gimmickry. It is time we stopped wasting our energy with old men whose time and idealogy has aged and look at more pressing problems than what SRK said, like improving the infrastructure for one.
Re: Through out SS
by Barkar Khajanchi on Feb 11, 2010 02:03 PM
You have gutts to tell same things what you said for Kashmir ????? and ask them to get out from here bcos you are not only deviding Indian, you want to be a part of Porkistan and occupied areas of Paks.
