As expected, people will start saying something against Raja Sen. But india is a free country and like you he too can give his views. It is very boring to read comments unrelated to movie or review and related to a person.
RE:A free country
by venkatapaty swami on Apr 04, 2008 01:36 PM
well me patel....if mr sen really 'reviews' a movie...they would read it and get on with life...but if he talks about things other than the movie..then readers I guess get distracted and the target becomes mr sen...and quite deservedly so...
This is a copy of 'A few good men'!! Atleast bollywood guys should pay the royalty b4 ripping of such good movies to dance masti stupid jingotic 'masala' movies.
It is not 'Tom Cruise and Keifer Sutherland' who are fighting the case in 'Few Good Men' Rather it is Tom cruse and Kevin Beacon who are the rival lawyers.
RE:Correction
by Arun Radhakrishnan on Apr 04, 2008 01:42 PM
he said sutherland and cruise 'excel in their multifaceted, deceptively demanding roles'. he didnt say they were rival lawyers.
RE:Correction
by manoj acharya on Apr 04, 2008 02:07 PM
You are right,I just checked my DVD collection wonder why I miss him, during the movie. May be due to small role, he got in the movie. He is quite used to get the major roles. Thanx
RE:Correction
by ajay on Apr 04, 2008 02:00 PM
Correction: He was very much there in the movie, he is a witness whom Cruise questions during the trial.
RE:shaurya
by Vikram Patil on Apr 04, 2008 01:15 PM
raja sen"s looks and openions are similar to his reviews about films BAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD .i have nothing aginst the film but a lot against raja .simply coz i think ge is a wrong man caught in the wrong job .
RE:shaurya
by atanu sarkar on Apr 04, 2008 01:31 PM
I donno why so many people here keep saying that Raja Sen favours SRK. I absolutely don't think so. And here's proof. He reviews what he thinks is right according to him. (Not that i agree with most of his reviews- esp with commercial movies like Race,bhool bhulaiya etc. i think his reviews are terribly wrong..even though his arty movies reviews are quite accurate and the other movies which are both meaningful and commercial like TZP, rang de basanti , etc.)
OK so for the record Raja Sen actually gave Chak De India only 3.5 stars , which was actually a fantastic movie and many reviewers (TOI, CNN - IBN) gave 4 stars. And well , OSO was a different kind of movie which many liked and many didn't. It was meant to be fun and in that spirit most reviewers including Raja (not just Raja) gave it 3, 3.5 or 4 stars (btw Raja gave 3.5 and not 4 which many of you keep saying each time). So, it was not like only Raja rated it well. Infact he quite clearly mentioned that the 2nd half was "pretty much salvaged by the songs and award function"...and most people found the 2nd half a little down but liked the first.
Ok , and here's the biggest proof of why Raja is not an srk supporter/sucker (or rather he won't rate his movies just because he likes him or something)...If u remember most people all over the media rated KANK as 3 to 4 stars.....
Raja was probably the only one who honestly rated it JUST 2 stars, not fearing any backlash or anything. And it was a BIG SRK movie everyone
