Hindi, Sanskit graduates: Explore multiple career paths!

Re: it is not Sanskrit but Sanskrut by m w on Aug 23, 2012 04:36 PM and Krushna not Krishna....we still are slaves to what the British told us.....break free people    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: it is not Sanskrit but Sanskrut by Ajit Menon on Aug 23, 2012 05:49 PM There is nothing wrong in this. The 'Re' in "Rishi' is a sound that is absent in Latin languages. So you have to find an equivalent. Pronounciation wise "Sanskrit" and "Sanskrut" are both incorrect pronounciations. If it was simply "ru" then the language wouldn't have needed a vowel for that.    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: it is not Sanskrit but Sanskrut by m w on Aug 24, 2012 02:11 PM Two aspects... language and roman scripts, whereas you are pointing to the deficiencies of the roman script, I was pointing to wrong pronunciations introduced in the language itself...There is no way anyone can justify borrowing a proper noun in the wrong manner from another language, it's just laziness...    Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: Re: Re: it is not Sanskrit but Sanskrut by Anand Tamariya on Aug 27, 2012 09:27 AM "Kri" in Krishna is pronounced same as in "Kriya". What's wrong here?    Forward   |   Report abuse