Please tell me when we have live playboy why should we think of evolution and torture fish....we can catch live playboy and do research with his consent
..only because fish is cheap but playboy is expensive and will throw lot of tantrums,this is the basic reason ....we human beings are habituated to harass innocent animals..and when we know man evolved from fish,then why should go back to million years and start researching on fish now ?
...From fish to human being there is a big evolutionary bilogical,socio cultural changes.Can any scientist tell me whether one fish cheats his wife and flirt with another fish ?..this can happen only in the case of human being.. In fact the researched fishes were thin and weak,because these scientists harassed them by changing their partners....
I am convinced fishes are loyal to their partners unlike playboys,can any one prove me wrong?
...and the fishes became weak not because of changing partners,but because they were unwillingly forced to change partner by the scientists...they were sad because of this forcefull changing of partners,they missed their ex girlfriends and lost their health because of this..playboys are not forced,they do it willingly..totally wrong research,I must say !
Its a simple concept... the more a person has sex or masturbates in the teenage before he becomes a adult, then he will have to suffer physical setbacks...
Re: Its not just short lives
by om shanti on Sep 08, 2010 08:39 AM
Play boy is not a boy,Play boy is the name given to people of any age who has the habit of flirting and convincing and taking women to bed,this term is normally used for matured adult..Imran Khan was a famous play boy during his playing days,yes there are also matured adults whose sole job is that of playboy !
You are right about health setbacks,anything emotional or physical in excess is not good for health...
I think scientists who do this kind of research die young..
To be a good play boy you have to have good look,good health,good communication skills.So all the time,you are smart,energized and presentable.It keeps you young at heart and you live longer.
Re: Such scientists die young..
by rocky on Sep 08, 2010 07:41 AM
you are a moron to say nehru, khuswant singh, dev anand to be play boy... scientists are not losers like you to blabber something in the name of blogging
Re: Re: Such scientists die young..
by om shanti on Sep 08, 2010 08:29 AM
May I know how do you define playboy?
Aristotle was also a scientist who said sun moves round the earth,which was just reversed by Galileo...
Even Stephen Hawking said in 1994 that God created this universe and in 2010 he says God did not create universe...
And do you think study on a fish can be applicable to human being ? Or else fishes would have ruled this world and madam whould have been a whale and MMS would have been a dolphin !
Re: Re: Re: Such scientists die young..
by arpana cm on Sep 08, 2010 09:10 AM
U r one nut case. Galileo jus dint reverse it, he researched on the idea..I think u havnt gone thru stephen hawking articles/books. He then referred God as something that connects whole universe by which we all are here. His interpretation of God was different and now he is talking in your language of God. Again ur fish example!!..back up ur mind with human evolution and then write....don create fiction out of pure science...
Re: Re: Re: Re: Such scientists die young..
by om shanti on Sep 08, 2010 09:59 AM
ohhhh,I have to explain everything in detail about Galileo and all,definitely things were researched...
you tell me whether a fish died early or a play boy died early,how does it matter?You think playboy will stop being playboy because of this research ?But if I was a scientist,I will not do experiment with fish,I will directly catch hold of some playboys..somewhat in big brother or big boss style..when we have living play boys,why should we harass few innocent fishes?
Re: Re: Re: Re: Such scientists die young..
by om shanti on Sep 08, 2010 10:19 AM
Please tell me when we have live playboy why should we think of evolution and torture fish....we can catch live playboy and do research with his consent..only because fish is cheap but playboy is expensive and will throw lot of tantrums..we human beings are habituated to harass innocent animals..and when we know man evolved from fish,then why should go back to million years and start researching on fish now..from fish to human being there is a big evolutionary bilogical,socio cultural changes.Can any scientist tell me if one fish cheat his wife and flirt with another fish..this can happen only in the case of human being..in fact fishes were thin and weak,because these scientists harassed them by changing their partner,I am convinced fishes are more loyal to their partners,and the fishes became weak not because of changing partners,but because they were unwillingly forced to change partner by the scientists,they were sad because of this and lost their health..playboys are not forced,they do it willingly..totally wrong research !
Re: they might have shorter lives....
by rocky on Sep 08, 2010 07:45 AM
they also have stunted growth.. what do you say about that? does that make them happy also..?
Complete bull shit...Italians are the most playboy oreinted guys. They have multiple partners from their teeage days til they die...
Now go and check the average life of an Italian men and comapre it with average life of any other European country men.. (almost similar lviign conditions)....Again Italian men top the chart.....SO statistics prove..more sex more life....
Else explain why Italian men have average life of over 80.....
Who wants to live a vegetable, sex-less, frustrated life & live for a century? For what? Even your spouse & kids will curse you everyday.
Rather enjoy to the fullest every moment. At least the partners will have happy memories to cherish. Just keep it secret from other partners & jealous friends.
