Re: Deepika
by achtung baby on Aug 25, 2010 10:37 AM
beauty is in the eyes of the beholder... your wife may not be the best...but u will pamper her with complimentsss else u won't get loving ;) LOL ... you should have commonsense or no sense... uncommonsense is not good.
Re: Re: Deepika
by Guru on Aug 25, 2010 11:59 AM
She is not my wife, nor do I have to pamper her with compliments. When I pay for the tickets for her movie, I expect her to perform well or be attractive to my eyes. But she does neither. I don't understand what uncommonsense has to do with all these.
Re: Re: Deepika
by Maihoon Don on Aug 25, 2010 11:23 AM
deepika is not anyone's wife...she is supposed to be an actress and is not attractive...period.
Re: Re: Re: Deepika
by achtung baby on Aug 25, 2010 01:05 PM
u cannot understand a metaphor ...justifies that u r only good for watching moviess... if u don;'t find her attractive then why bother about her or her films ? ..someone doesn't like ur face doesnt enable him to abuse u right ?
again i repeat ..beauty is in the eyes of the beholder...u agree ?
Re: Re: Re: Deepika
by watcha doon on Aug 25, 2010 01:06 PM
precisely. she is "supposed" to be an actress, but she is extremely lousy in that department. What Guru is saying is that she's not even attractive (unlike Katrina Kaif, another nonsense actress but atleast some folks find her beautiful). This Deepika Padukone looks like slimmer version of silk smitha.
