Discussion Board

Total 681 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
prashant ramdas
unlikely
by prashant ramdas on Jan 17, 2011 07:54 PM  | Hide replies

very unlikely,too many experimentation.players like ashwin,chawla are not well exp either.team shud hv beineg grooved and not changed for each match.last odi yusuf was left out.nehra shud hv been rested

    Forward  |  Report abuse
akki
Re: unlikely
by akki on Jan 17, 2011 08:14 PM
you fool this is subcontinent ground spinners bowls well here dont put put personal opinion here srikant know what he is doing ye gali cricket or IPL nahi hai

   Forward   |   Report abuse
King Quality
Re: Re: unlikely
by King Quality on Jan 17, 2011 08:35 PM
Pragyan Ojha would have been a better option instead of Ashwin as he would have added variety to the bowling attack

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
D S
Dr. Love- Re: Re: Immaturity on Rohit
by D S on Jan 17, 2011 07:50 PM

who cares if INDIA WINS OR LOOSE, certain people should feel lucky if they dissociate themselves from india. On hind sight, if it happened to some of us 20 years ago, much better.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Vaishali Rindani
Team
by Vaishali Rindani on Jan 17, 2011 07:36 PM  | Hide replies

TIME WILL TELL.........

    Forward  |  Report abuse
westernmusic
Re: Team
by westernmusic on Jan 17, 2011 08:27 PM
they will never enter into semi finals with this team. thats sure.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Rahul Kumar
Why the hell they werent' include rohit sharma
by Rahul Kumar on Jan 17, 2011 07:33 PM  | Hide replies

Thw WC 2011 is to be held in INDIAN-subconti, and by the time i remember one cant win matches here bcoz of their bowlers, yes bowlers are important part but an extra batsman will be more beneficial in indian conditions. The tracks are flat here and i think the pitches will be tailored for run fest so an extra batsman with 4 bowlers will a good option, and ganguly in his time show us exactly that by playing 7 bat and 4 bowl with dravid as keeper to accomodate the 7th bat and the results, we all know. But guys hope for best and cheers 4 INDIA.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
akki
Re: Why the hell they werent' include rohit sharma
by akki on Jan 17, 2011 08:15 PM
because he is big panuti

   Forward   |   Report abuse
lalu
People who are fans of..
by lalu on Jan 17, 2011 07:28 PM

Ravindra Jadeja and irrfan pathan are Ffakkkiistaniz.. these 2 are sure recipes for disaster.. India is better off without them..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
atul langer
Extra spinner wasnt reqd
by atul langer on Jan 17, 2011 07:26 PM

Sreesanth should have been in the team instead of Piyush Chawla

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Abhilash Jaiswal
Rohit in place of Virat
by Abhilash Jaiswal on Jan 17, 2011 07:20 PM

I believe Rohit is effective than Virat in Indian conditions.........

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Abhilash Jaiswal
Rohit Sharma instead of Virat Kohli
by Abhilash Jaiswal on Jan 17, 2011 07:16 PM

I still believe that Rohit Sharma should have been taken instead of Virat Kohli as Rohit is more reliable than Virat in Indian Conditions.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
birendra kumar
What about Irfan Pathan?
by birendra kumar on Jan 17, 2011 07:14 PM

Irfan pathan should be in the current squad.If recall the past 2or3 yrs of his performance with bat as well as ball he justify certainly his presence in the team.Earlier coach greg chappel is fully responsible for blocking of his carreer in world cricket....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 681 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message