Re: change
by Anup Taneja on Dec 29, 2011 06:41 PM
Whether pujara or tiwari, it ought to be remembered that these players score heavily on the slow, spinning tracks of India. Dravid and Laxman are vastly experienced and know how to play in Australian conditions. Time is not ripe to introduce the likes of pujara/tiwari in Australia.
Dhoni is wrong here. Whatever else we blame the Indian team for, we cannot blame them for being inconsistent. If we exclude the unnecessary West-Indies series from the pattern, Indian batting line-up has been performing very consistently. The only inconsistent blot coming in the first innings of the fourth Test against England, where India actually scored 300. The performance of the Indians has been very consistent. Any student of Statistics can predict their score in the next two innings with uncanny accuracy.
Re: Sachin
by YOGESH BORSE on Dec 29, 2011 06:03 PM
idiot, sachin was the best amongst all the batsmen from both sides, didnt u see that...u only blame him...on that pitch even aussies were vulnerable..only he looked good right fro the start...and got out to two really good deliveries and not playing rash shots.......
Re: Re: Sachin
by S Shrikanth on Dec 29, 2011 06:16 PM
Whats the use being the best batsman when you play an individual innings, you are only only hittings 4s to maintain a strike rate 80% . This was a test match and as the senior most person, you should had inspired and guided the junior members to achieve 292.
Re: Re: Re: Sachin
by Against Pseudos on Dec 29, 2011 09:35 PM
:-)... Junior members should first achieve double digits. Secondly they are there to perform. Else they can complete their stay in training academy first.
