Re: leo here or should I say a soul who is nowhere
by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:06 PM
also going by same logic...y do u admire sachin? r u gay ? dats y u like sachin?
Re: Re: leo here or should I say a soul who is nowhere
by dalai lama on Nov 20, 2009 06:11 PM
does that mean you dont like your father?! either you dont have one or you too are a gay .. and you shud be happy. do you have a choice?! GBY
I think people are jealous about Sachin's records. I can't understand why so much hate comments on him. He played out the whole day with Gambhir and Laxman. Doesn't he deserve a 100?
In test cricket it's always batsman's choice whether continue to play or stop when he wants, that's why there are things like 'declare'. It's always batsmen on the field decides but the captain of batting side can override batsman's decision.
Does Dhoni have any guts to call Sachin Tendulkar to the pavilion when he is on 80s?
Dhoni and entire team was happy seeing Tendulkar continued, it's only jealous people are posting hate comments here.
when the match continued, Sankakara made id even tougher for Laxman and Sachin to get their 50 and 100. The bowlers started bowling negative line. It was great challenge by Sankakara and Sachin was determined to face it and he did try and kept his nerve and got that 100. It was awesome watching a great phase of play for half an hour.
This 100 of Sachin is well earned and Sachin can be proud of it.
Re: Re: If I had played for 20 years
by Save Tiger on Nov 20, 2009 06:03 PM
you are also not there.There is only 1/1200000000 people.Coming from village it is not possible to get into Indian cricket team.
Re: Re: Re: Re: If I had played for 20 years
by Sameer on Nov 20, 2009 06:20 PM
dude save tiger can play cricket in bed with himself. No sane person would be in bed with " Save Tiger"
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: If I had played for 20 years
by Ullhas Sontake on Nov 20, 2009 06:09 PM
so you are not allrounder right :) you are missing on end :)
Some poster here think that if they are not using bad words against Sachin in thier comments, it can not be termed as abusive.
It is not true.
If you try to demean him for his efforts by saying that he played to record--It is an abuse.
Today like in the past also, Sachin first made sure that India do not lose match and then went for his century.
What is wrong in that?
The match was destined for Draw when SRL went on score 700 runs before declaring, knowing well that only draw was possible, allowing Mahela & Prasana to score 275 and 150 runs.
India was on the field more than SRL. What was wrong, if SRLs were asked to be there for another 15 overs. It was well within ruls.
Why should India lose an opportunity to get match practice--much better than a net practice--and in the process give Sachin to complete his 43rd century, which he deserved fully?
Re: Re: Re: his Test average against Mcgrath nd pollock and akhta
by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:00 PM
abey bola naa...30s mein hain..so dat means he has played bad agaisnt one country...agaisnt bhajji/ishant..
Re: Re: his Test average against Mcgrath nd pollock and akhtar
by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 06:00 PM
in 30s in india dat means he has poor records agaisnt india....dats it?
Re: LG
by Subramani on Nov 20, 2009 05:57 PM
ICC always supports aussies, because of color. ICC even didnt witheld the test match of sydney, 2008 jan, which austrailia won with the help of umpirs
Re: Praise
by leo here on Nov 20, 2009 05:57 PM
match was already saved..der was no ned 2 stretch dat match,,did u see how he pleaded wid sangkara in dressing room?
Re: Re: Praise
by BigCobra on Nov 20, 2009 06:05 PM
No Match can Deside up too last Bowl Bowlled, So You can say may be if he loose his wicket loose very early, may be any Drametic Down Falls of wickets will started. May be ......
