freddie dont even think of removing shirt this time if you win. we know there is no ganguly and mohammed kaif this time in the squad....but there is bhajji... he wont slap but will kick in your balls.... hahahaha
Re: 'I am now in a role that is more comfortable'
by naveen dhanerwal on Nov 12, 2008 09:21 AM
lOl! He won't repeat it now because he's more matured then he was before. He understand his responsiblities well. No one can doubt on his elegancy and everyone would like to watch him play.
gambhir has admitted that he hit watson with his elbow n more importantly he doesnt lament it. well done. this shameless ausis need to shown that if they do the mischief, they vl b hit not with an elbow, but next time, they vl b hit with a bat on their head.
Re: well done gambhir as he admits it.
by naveen dhanerwal on Nov 12, 2008 09:27 AM
...and will be banned forever! Actually you can take it on either side, hit him or tease him. Gambhir said right that there is a limit one can tolerate and that's been over in his case. He also said right that if hitting somebody is a crime, abusing somebody on the field should be also. If a player provoke someone, he should have got the reply like Gambhir did. Why didn't Watson get banned also?
Somehow i cant help feeling england will be tougher than aussies to beat. Simple becoz they have a good bowling attack. Flintoff, Harmisson, Anderson, Monty Panesar
Re: England will be tougher than Aussies
by sg on Nov 12, 2008 12:13 AM
But just having a good attack isn't enough. That needs to be displayed on the field. England were formidable against SA not too long ago, but I think they just lost focus. Just look how they were comprehensively beaten in the Stanford 20/20 and now by a star players depleted Mumbai team.
Re: England will be tougher than Aussies
by nischal maniar on Nov 12, 2008 01:39 AM
Yea .. their batsmen need to fire if they want to put up some fight. But what i meant was ... england's bowling attack will cause more problems to indian batsman than the aussie bowling attack. Its england's batting that will have the tough test
These 2 bloggers are accusing me of abusing Dhoni since morning. Just go through my each and every message, I havent used a single word of abuse against Dhoni. I hv only said that it was height of carelessness on the part of Dhoni to forget to compliment Harbhajan on his brilliant performance. On the contrary these 2 bloggers hv been abusing me and the Sikh community. Jinke Ghar sheeshe ke hon woh doosron pe pathar nahin phenka karte.
Congrates to Guru grage Chapple for "namak ka karz pura karna kay liya" , he has supported India by accepting the asst coach position of australian team and giving them FOOLISH Advise, ( As usual once upon a time he has destoryed the India Team ) as result Australiya ki Halat Kharab ho gayee
i think d 2001 series was better bcoz it was against steve waugh's men who had won 15 matches in a row b4 d series. 2008 team was a depleted team without any gameplan never the less a victory is victory. HURRAY INDIANS
Re: 2001 was better
by vinay on Nov 12, 2008 01:46 AM
i agree abt this weak ausi team. still its good that these ponting men were humiliated with a 2-0 defeat.
Love this Indian Team because they are very enthusiastic & aggressive in their approach. They are not getting carried away by the success. Some players have to get more matured like Sreesanth, Yuvraj, Raina & Rohit. Then India will become a super power in the world of cricket. I wish to see Yuvraj Singh playing in all formats of the game. For this he have to shape up well. He has to get his technique right. Sehwag can fill up the place of Sachin & Yuvraj can fill up the place of Saurav if they get matured. And with Dhoni as captain Indian Team can go to greater heights for sure. I WISH THEM ALL THE SUCCESS
The above sentence was uttered by Flintoff and not by me. However, I found truth on his statement. These seniors play in one test and take rest for the second one. In a way its good that promising youngsters like Vijay get chance.
