Since the judge did not know the meaning of the word used by Bhajji to abuse, he was let off easily. teri maki is a worse word for abuse in Indian sense. He should have been fined more or even banned from playing cridket.
RE:teri maki is a worse abuse than monkey
by Khushi on Feb 01, 2008 04:44 AM
yes teri maki is a worse abuse than monkey, but the australian players are too used to these words that they don't find it abusive.... and then they frequently use such terms on the field, so they could not have framed charges on that ground.
RE:teri maki is a worse abuse than monkey
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 12:40 PM
yep I agree teri maaki is far more worse than monkey. Strangely Aussies dont seem to matter that much on how abusive it is to all the women.
RE:teri maki is a worse abuse than monkey
by suman singh on Jan 31, 2008 06:59 PM
what about the time when aussies used the word bastards for Kumble and Dhoni???????????
RE:teri maki is a worse abuse than monkey
by pritesh vora on Jan 31, 2008 01:18 PM
Yes that is bad word. How about bad words,used by other team. Double standard
you called Indians as curry munchers you called the entire Indians as liars you like to tease Indian boys(paedophilia) etc etc etc, you should be ashamed of yourself.
RE:I have more proofs Chris of your racist nature
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:54 AM
such a retard... I already said I am racist... what on Earth is your point?
And more threads dedicated to me, looks like you are another rediff love stalker for me to add to the list.
RE:I have more proofs Chris of your racist nature
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 12:06 PM
you are. Anyhow by your logic mere allegation is enough to judge somebody lol
Forget everything else and just think whether Bhaji really deserves a place in the team based on his current performances.He should not take the verdict as his place in the team.He has not performed for longtime.Though ban is lifted but selectors have to now take decision that whether he should be in the team.He was demoralised and all cant be excuse as then he would not have performed with bat.He should be out of the team till he performs in home cricket.
RE:Should Bhaji Play Cricket
by Srinivas Kasinathan on Jan 31, 2008 05:23 PM
Well taken point. Bhajji should be dropped from the team since he does not add any value to the team. Of course, you can say the same about a lot of others in the team but then they do not use their mouths like Bhajji does and get the team into trouble. BCCI needs to have its head examined! If it has one that is!!
RE:Should Bhaji Play Cricket
by hindublogger on Jan 31, 2008 11:59 AM
I agree ..he was able to cover up his failure with this controversy and his success against Ponting
RE:Should Bhaji Play Cricket
by umesh gawande on Jan 31, 2008 11:21 AM
Mr. Tushar, If you drop bhajji for one day then whom do you suggest can take his place in on eday. We should have one exp. spinner in the side for one day series in AUST. Very soon you will see how the new commers will perform in Austrellia. Being Bhajji in team is very good now...He alwys has taken pointing Wicket whioch is good sign . If he do so in One day nothing better than this..Inaddition he bats in lower order so.......
RE:Should Bhaji Play Cricket
by Tushar Thanki on Jan 31, 2008 11:39 AM
If you need experience then you have list of spinners whom you can play.To start with Murli kartik.God knows after good show against Ozes why was he ignored.May be Dhoni does not like him.Mind you Kartik too can play.The important thing is we will be playing 11 players and not only Ponting.
Still you persist in your thoughts that personal abuse is ok whereas racial abuse is not. That is where the diffrence lies lol. We Indians have a problem with that and we will get it changed and make it both punishable. Other countries do taunt but it is the Australians who took it to a new level where they deliberately target a player and gave it the name of sledging/mental disintegration. It is Steve Waugh who took it to a whole new level. All the bowlers that i mentioned are chuckers and still I believe that. Witty taunts are ok say something like 'you just dropped the world cup mate' but not personal abuses like 'so how does Lara's dick taste like'(McGrath to Sarwan). how come you so conveniently believed that Shane Warne was not a serial drug cheat. Once a cheat always a cheat aint' it not ? If so why was he banned for a year if he just took some pill over the counter lol. You believe that but wont believe Harbhajan said 'tere maaki' rather than 'monkey' lol shows who is biased and moronic. The judge has virtually proclaimed Clarke as a liar and yet you believe in the stupid little lie of Andrew Symonds. You did not answer my Lee point. I have one little hunch why Lee is not responding he is not responding coz that will put Symonds in ever poor light, coz he will have to tell that Harbhajan was only appreciating a good yorker of mine lol. Most of the Aussies are good blokes and not liars like Symonds and Clarke
RE:Hey Chris
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:08 AM
You're an idiot. Regardless of what I think, the ICC says racism is outside the rules of the game while sledging isn't.
Lee is not responding because he's not the one to get involved and never has been and because of he is a lucrative commercial product in India.
And ofcourse I believe he said monkey, as does every Indian with half a brain, the tere maaki nonsense was produced days after the event and started out as a joke, India just decided it sounded good and clung to it.
Lol at conveniently believe Warne wasn't a serial drug cheat, that's hilarious. Yeah man, he was a diet pill junkie lol.
RE:Hey Chris
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 11:25 AM
you are still evading the issue lol. Warne is a drug cheat and compared to US where Marion Jones reputation is in complete tatters after being proved as a drug cheat, Warne is treated as a hero down under.
RE:Hey Chris
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 11:32 AM
why was he banned for a year then if it was a simple mistake. And I know how you got your first world status by massacring aborigines no doubt lol
RE:RE:Hey Chris
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:40 AM
Because that is what the penalty is, and he copped it sweet instead of Australia threatening boycotts and other disgusting acts. If your gonna keep harping on about the subject the very least you could do is take some time to research it and make an actual point.
RE:Hey Chris
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 11:47 AM
yep killing/stealing generations is a laughing matter for you no doubt. That is why the Aussie government is going to apologize for it and that is why Cathy Freeman draped herself with aboriginal flag and the Australian flag when she won the gold in 400 m lol. So if a cheat who was caught cheating and was punished for it deserves to be venerated like a God lol nice logic
RE:RE:Hey Chris
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:54 AM
Yeah lol @ aboriginies.
And yeah Warne is a god for his feats, no question amongst anyone really. And if he cheated then Dravid cheated when he rubbed a lolly on the ball unaware of his actions. /shrug I could care less either way, Warne served his ban like a man, India cried like girls, such is life, such is Australia and such is India.
RE:Hey Chris
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 12:07 PM
drug cheating is way bigger than ball tampering lol for your kind info. And anyhow you still venerate him after banning him for a complete year. Good role model
Harbhajan Singh let off because of he didn%u2019t do that because Cricket Australia warned its players that if they were sued for losses by host broadcaster ESPN in case India pulled out, then it might take upto 10 years to recover the money.
RE:The most shameful event of the game of cricket.
by sam on Jan 31, 2008 10:47 AM
Sundhar How many more myths you want to spread? Harbhajan incident never happened, harbhajan was never suspeneded, NZ judge is a black person.
Actually sydnet test never happened. well Australia does not exists at all...
Now is the time when India and Srilanka can join hands against Australia, - in Australia !!!
In the upcoming ODI series, they should file complaints on every/any objectionable word behavior of a mite. It will kill Aus cricket, I am sure if they are able to get ban/punishment on a couple of thugs, that will send Australian cricket in coma for years.
They should record their objection with umpire whenever a 'mite' shows his character or demonstrates his 'culture'.
India SriLanka and Pakistan cricket teams should join hands - against Australia. The players should go after the mites (anyway this bacteria is no good, for the filthy 'culture' it spreads...)
RE:India is great
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 11:37 AM
do you know basic maths. In India denominator is more but the numerator is less, the problem in India is because of denominator not because of numerator(rate of infection), so you also admit that Aussies like you massacred aborigines lol
RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:43 AM
lol? Dude you are such a moron. By percentages, (thank you for explaining the concept lol, you did such a good job too) straight hard number comparisons or indeed any other comparison your 3rd world education can come up with, India is Aids central and Australia is sweet.
RE:India is great
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 11:48 AM
India is not it is myth propogated by the big pharma companies to sell their medicines. The rate of infection was found to be far lesser than what was assumed.
RE:RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:57 AM
Yes, from epidemic to infestation.
Just admit it and move on, you picked a losing fight, the prevalence of Aids in India when compared to Australia is far far far worse and no amount of posting will change this fact. Suck it up son and move on.
RE:RE:RE:India is great
by Indian on Jan 31, 2008 10:03 PM
Oh Chris: India has AIDS? When did it happen? You must tell us all about it. But just type it in. Don't personally come visiting us. We don't want further infections to spread out. Many of our men forget to wear condoms, you see. And that will be bad for them when you are here. So type on. :-) Cheers!
RE:RE:India is great
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 12:11 PM
i didnt admit anything. Numerator is not as bring as western countries. Surely we are not the Aids country of the world. That distinction goes to South Africa maybe.
RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 10:00 AM
Hang on a second, what is wrong with my point that India is great at spreading Aids? And I'm all for discussing it.
RE:RE:India is great
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 10:13 AM
India percent of population infected with AIDS is lower I guess than Australia. And btw why dont we discuss Australia genocide of aborigines
RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 10:16 AM
Lol, I think you should stop guessing dude before I pull out the stats and show you how stupid you are.
RE:India is great
by chidamber on Jan 31, 2008 01:32 PM
Its not any Indian dear its a Monkey who gave Aids and Ponting was complaining to umpire about it and clarke cried over it.
RE:RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:15 AM
lol so what your sticking to your guns that Aids is more prevalent in Australia than India or what?
RE:RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:32 AM
ahhh so you admit defeat then, and you realise now that in comparison to Australia (and everywhere else that isn't Africa) India is an Aids infestation. Good to know.
RE:India is great
by chris on Jan 31, 2008 11:14 AM
lol so what your sticking to your guns that Aids is more prevalent in Australia than India or what?
RE:India is great
by cynic on Jan 31, 2008 11:27 AM
i am not offended by your stupid little jibes lol. Try it on Symonds maybe he will run to the umpires to complain about it lol
RE:India is great
by Indian on Jan 31, 2008 10:00 PM
Hey chris: Please discuss it. I give you permission to do so. Cheers. P.S.: Just ensure that you don't post your crap on this forum. Discuss it like a decent Aussie in your dreams.. :-)
